☰

ラテックステーブルが凝縮されて小さすぎる

tag-icon • tag-icon tables resize textwidth
ラテックステーブルが凝縮されて小さすぎる

申し訳ありませんが、私は Latex 初心者です。表を作成しようとしていますが、圧縮された状態で表示されます。表全体の高さは約 3 cm です。A4 シートの縦向きレイアウトで表をきちんと読み取れるようにしたいです。助けてください。

\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{*{14}{|c}|}%{|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline

\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\textbf{S No.}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Test Description}}                      & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{High Level Steps}}                                                                                                                   & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Expected Output}}                                                                                                   & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{PQA Status}}                                                                                                              \\ \hline
1                                    & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR & a)Take the available complete IHC portfolio.b)Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc)Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout                                                                         & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ \hline
2                                    & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout                             & a)Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph                                           & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.                & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.                                                                                           \\ \hline
3                                    & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout                             & a)Choose an option with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph                                        & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.                                                                                           \\ \hline
4                                    & Swap with IM and without IM                                         & a)Take one year swap and run it with IM.b)Take the same swap and run it without IM. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.                           & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.                                                                   & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.                                                                                           \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
}
\end{table}

ありがとう、ヴァルン

答え1

テーブルを再設計します:

ここに画像の説明を入力してください

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{booktabs, makecell, tabularx}
\renewcommand\theadfont{\bfseries}
\renewcommand\theadgape{}
\newcolumntype{L}{>{\RaggedRight}X}

\begin{document}
    \begin{table}[htb]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
    \footnotesize
    \setlength\tabcolsep{3pt}
\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{@{} l
              >{\hsize=0.8\hsize}L
              >{\hsize=1.2\hsize}L
                            *{2}{L}
                @{}}
    \toprule
\thead[b]{S\\ No.}
    &   \thead{Test Description}
        &   \thead{High Level Steps}
            &   \thead{Expected Output}
                &   \thead{PQA Status}             \\
    \midrule
1  & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
        & a) Take the available complete IHC portfolio.\quad
          b) Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc). Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data
            & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
                & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\
    \addlinespace
2  & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
        & a) Choose a swap with one year maturity. \quad
          b) Apply both methodologies on the swap. \quad
          c) Plot the exposure profile on a graph.
            & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.
                & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.               \\
    \addlinespace
3   & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
        & a) Choose an option with one year maturity. \quad
          b) Apply both methodologies on the swap. \quad
          c) Plot the exposure profile on a graph
            & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry.
                & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.               \\
    \addlinespace
4   & Swap with IM and without IM
        & a)Take one year swap and run it with IM. \quad
          b) Take the same swap and run it without IM.
          Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
            & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
                & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.               \\
    \bottomrule
\end{tabularx}%
    \end{table}
\end{document}

編集:提案を考慮してレアンドリス答えは、コードを改善すると、テーブルは次のようになります。

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{booktabs, makecell, tabularx}
\renewcommand\theadfont{\bfseries}
\renewcommand\theadgape{}
\newcolumntype{L}{>{\RaggedRight}X}

\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\AtBeginEnvironment{table}{%
\setlist[enumerate]{nosep, % <-- list setup used in all tables
                     topsep = 0pt,
                     partopsep = 0pt,
                     wide,
                     label=\alph*),
                     before = \vspace{-0.6\baselineskip},
                     }
                        }
\begin{document}
    \begin{table}[htb]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
    \footnotesize
    \setlength\tabcolsep{3pt}
\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{@{} l
              >{\hsize=0.8\hsize}L
              >{\hsize=1.2\hsize}L
                            *{2}{L}
                @{}}
    \toprule
\thead[b]{S\\ No.}
    &   \thead{Test Description}
        &   \thead{High Level Steps}
            &   \thead{Expected Output}
                &   \thead{PQA Status}             \\
    \midrule
1  & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
        & \begin{enumerate} 
            \item   Take the available complete IHC portfolio.
            \item   Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc). 
          \end{enumerate}
          Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data
            & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
                & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\
    \addlinespace
2  & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
        & \begin{enumerate}
            \item   Choose a swap with one year maturity. 
            \item   Apply both methodologies on the swap. 
            \item   Plot the exposure profile on a graph.
          \end{enumerate}  
            & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.
                & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.               \\
    \addlinespace
3   & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
        & \begin{enumerate}
            \item   Choose an option with one year maturity.
            \item   Apply both methodologies on the swap. 
            \item   Plot the exposure profile on a graph
          \end{enumerate}  
            & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry.
                & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.               \\
    \addlinespace
4   & Swap with IM and without IM
        & \begin{enumerate}
            \item   Take one year swap and run it with IM.
            \item   Take the same swap and run it without IM.
          \end{enumerate}  
          Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
            & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
                & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.               \\
    \bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
    \end{table}
\end{document}

これにより、次のようになります。

ここに画像の説明を入力してください

答え2

いくつか小さな変更を加えました。

  • 14 列を削除しました。 使用しているのは 4 列のみです。

  • 最初の列の幅を固定しました1cm

  • セルサイズを に固定しました(\textwidth-1cm)/4。

  • を削除し\resizebox、 で手動でフォントサイズを変更しました\footnotesize。これは自由に変更してください。

  • \multicolumns実際には使用していなかったため、削除しました。

ここに画像の説明を入力してください

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{graphicx}

\begin{document}
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\footnotesize
% \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{|p{1cm}*{4}{|p{\dimexpr(\textwidth-1cm)/4\relax}}|}%{|l|l|l|l|l|}
\hline

\textbf{S No.} & \textbf{Test Description}                      & \textbf{High Level Steps}                                                                                                                   & \textbf{Expected Output}                                                                                                   & \textbf{PQA Status}                                                                                                              \\ \hline
1                                    & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR & a)Take the available complete IHC portfolio.b)Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc)Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout                                                                         & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ \hline
2                                    & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout                             & a)Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph                                           & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.                & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.                                                                                           \\ \hline
3                                    & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout                             & a)Choose an option with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph                                        & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.                                                                                           \\ \hline
4                                    & Swap with IM and without IM                                         & a)Take one year swap and run it with IM.b)Take the same swap and run it without IM. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.                           & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.                                                                   & The same result can be implied from already run test cases.                                                                                           \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
% }
\end{table}
\end{document}

答え3

tabularx環境を使用した異なるアプローチenumerate:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\raggedright\arraybackslash}X}

\begin{document}

\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{cYYYY}

\textbf{S No.} & \textbf{Test Description} & \textbf{High Level Steps}                                                                                                           & \textbf{Expected Output}                                                                                                 & \textbf{PQA Status} \\ \midrule
1                                    
& Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR 
& \begin{enumerate}[a)]\vspace*{-1.5\baselineskip}
   \item Take the available complete IHC portfolio.
   \item Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaR
   \item Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data 
   \end{enumerate}
   & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\  \midrule
\end{tabularx}%
\end{table}
\end{document}

答え4

ベースの別のtabularxソリューションを紹介します。最初の列には列タイプを使用しl、X4 つのデータ列には変更された列を使用します。垂直方向の罫線はすべて削除し、少数ですが十分な間隔のある水平方向の罫線を使用します。視覚的な区切りを作成する目的では、空白が実線と同じくらい効果的であることに注意してください。各セルの素材は、ハイフネーションを許可しながら、完全に揃えるのではなく、右端に揃えられています。~必要に応じて、タイ ( ) が挿入され、2 番目のデータ列で不適切な改行が防止されます。最後に、大胆な実際には必要ないので、ヘッダー行から削除します。

ここに画像の説明を入力してください

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]{geometry} % set page parameters suitably
\usepackage{tabularx,booktabs,caption,ragged2e}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}X}

\begin{document}
\begin{table}[ht!]
\setlength\tabcolsep{4pt} % default is 6pt
\captionsetup{skip=0.333\baselineskip}
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests} \label{BT2}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{@{} l *{4}{Y} @{}}
\toprule
S No. & Test Description & High-Level Steps & Expected Output & PQA Status\\ 
\midrule
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR 
  & a) Take the available complete IHC portfolio. b)~Obtain the same COB production 10~Day VaR\@. c)~Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data 
  & 10~Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
  & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ 
\addlinespace
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
  & a) Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)~Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)~Plot the exposure profile on a graph 
  & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark. 
  & The same result can be implied from already-run test cases. \\ 
\addlinespace
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
  & a) Choose an option with one year maturity. b)~Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)~Plot the exposure profile on a graph 
  & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry. 
  & The same result can be implied from already-run test cases.\\ 
\addlinespace
4 & Swap with IM and without IM 
  & a) Take one year swap and run it with~IM\@. b)~Take the same swap and run it without~IM\@. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
  & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
  & The same result can be implied from already-run test cases.\\ 
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\end{document}

関連情報