☰

グラフィック間のスペースを減らす

tag-icon • tag-icon spacing
グラフィック間のスペースを減らす

2 つのグラフィックの間には半ページほどのスペースがあります。これらをもっと近づけたいのです。これが MWE です:

\documentclass[notitlepage]{report}
\usepackage[left=1in, right=1in, top=1in, bottom=1in]{geometry} 
\usepackage{enumitem} 
\usepackage{titling}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{placeins}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\begin{document}

\begin{figure}
    \centering
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
        \centering
        \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{linear.png}
        \caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.3$}
    \end{subfigure}%
    ~ 
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
        \centering
        \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{exponential.png}
        \caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.81$}
    \end{subfigure}
    \caption{Small $x[0]$}
\addtolength{\textfloatsep}{-0.2in}
\end{figure}

\FloatBarrier
This behavior could be due to $y'[t]$ decreasing in value quickly with large $y[0], \delta_{1}$, and $\delta_{2}$ and $x'[t]$ then increasing in value as the $-\delta_{2}y$ decreases in absolute value while the denominator, $1-\delta_{1}$ is small, causing $x[t]$ to increase faster.

For $x_[0] = .45$, we see similar behavior as we adjust our deltas, but $x[t]$ is monotone decreasing.
\begin{figure}
    \centering

    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
        \centering
        \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{LowD.png}
        \caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.3$}
    \end{subfigure}%
    ~ 
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
        \centering
        \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{HigherD.png}
        \caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.81$}
\setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{-10pt}
    \end{subfigure}
    \caption{Large $x[0]$}
\end{figure}
\FloatBarrier

\end{document}

ページの中央のスペースを節約するにはどうすればよいでしょうか?

答え1

-オプションを追加すると、2 番目の図をテキストに近づけることができます!htbp。

\documentclass[notitlepage]{report}
\usepackage[left=1in, right=1in, top=1in, bottom=1in]{geometry} 
\usepackage{enumitem} 
\usepackage{titling}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{placeins}
\usepackage{subcaption}

\usepackage{setspace}
\renewcommand{\topfraction}{0.45}


\begin{document}


\begin{figure}
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
        \centering
        \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{1}
        \caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.3$}
    \end{subfigure}%
    ~ 
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
        \centering
        \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{1}
        \caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.81$}
    \end{subfigure}
    \caption{Small $x[0]$}
\addtolength{\textfloatsep}{-0.2in}
\end{figure}


\FloatBarrier
This behavior could be due to $y'[t]$ decreasing in value quickly with large $y[0], \delta_{1}$, and $\delta_{2}$ and $x'[t]$ then increasing in value as the $-\delta_{2}y$ decreases in absolute value while the denominator, $1-\delta_{1}$ is small, causing $x[t]$ to increase faster.

For $x_[0] = .45$, we see similar behavior as we adjust our deltas, but $x[t]$ is monotone decreasing.
\begin{figure}[!htbp]
    \centering

    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
        \centering
        \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{1}
        \caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.3$}
    \end{subfigure}%
    ~ 
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
        \centering
        \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{1}
        \caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.81$}
\setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{-10pt}
    \end{subfigure}
    \caption{Large $x[0]$}
\end{figure}
\FloatBarrier

\end{document}

ここに画像の説明を入力してください

答え2

ここに画像の説明を入力してください

  • 使う必要はありません\FloatBarrier
  • フロートするにはfigure、配置オプションを追加します[ht]（@Janが提案したように）彼の答え）
  • subcptionからまでの幅を縮小する0.5（例）0.4
  • サブ図の間のスペースには\hfil
  • \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{-10pt}文書の序文から削除するfigureか移動する
\documentclass[notitlepage, demo]{report}% in real document delete option demo
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{titling}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{placeins}
\usepackage{subcaption}

\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[ht]
    \centering
\begin{subfigure}{0.4\textwidth}
    \centering
\includegraphics[height=2.0in]{linear.png}
\caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.3$}
\end{subfigure}%
    \hfil
\begin{subfigure}{0.4\textwidth}
    \centering
\includegraphics[height=2.0in]{exponential.png}
\caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.81$}
    \end{subfigure}
\caption{Small $x[0]$}
\end{figure}
%\FloatBarrier
This behavior could be due to $y'[t]$ decreasing in value quickly with large $y[0], \delta_{1}$, and $\delta_{2}$ and $x'[t]$ then increasing in value as the $-\delta_{2}y$ decreases in absolute value while the denominator, $1-\delta_{1}$ is small, causing $x[t]$ to increase faster.

For $x_[0] = .45$, we see similar behavior as we adjust our deltas, but $x[t]$ is monotone decreasing.
    \begin{figure}[ht]
    \centering
\begin{subfigure}{0.4\textwidth}
    \centering
\includegraphics[height=2.0in]{LowD.png}
\caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.3$}
    \end{subfigure}
    \hfil
    \begin{subfigure}{0.4\textwidth}
    \centering
\includegraphics[height=2.0in]{HigherD.png}
\caption{$\delta_{1}$ and $\delta_{2}$ $= 0.81$}
    \end{subfigure}
    \caption{Large $x[0]$}
\end{figure}
%\FloatBarrier

\end{document}

関連情報