In einem langen Dokument habe ich mehrere Tabellen, die sich über mehr als eine Seite erstrecken. Die meisten davon enthalten viel Text, daher verwende ich tabularxein Paket, um die richtige Verteilung der Spaltenbreiten zu erhalten. Ich habe dies gemäß den Ratschlägen aus einer anderen Frage hier (kann sie jetzt nicht finden) unter Verwendung ltablexeines Pakets getan und habe das folgende Dokument. (Beispiel)
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper,twoside,table]{report}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{helvet}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[]{xcolor}
\definecolor{steelblue}{RGB}{70,130,180}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage[labelfont=bf,textfont=normal,justification=justified,singlelinecheck=false]{caption}
\usepackage{ltablex}
\begin{document}
\footnotesize
\renewcommand\arraystretch{1.25}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{
>{\setlength\hsize{0.5 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.15 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.17 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.08 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.1 \hsize}\centering}X}
\caption{\small Sample caption.} \\
\label{tab:qfd}
\rowcolor{steelblue} \textcolor{white}{Quality Characteristics ( Requirements)} & \textcolor{white}{Minimize, Maximize, or Target} & \textcolor{white}{Max Relationship} & \textcolor{white}{Requirement Weight} & \textcolor{white}{Relative Weight} \tabularnewline
Possibility of Automation & maximize & 9 & 14,64 & 1,14\% \tabularnewline
Curling & minimize & 1 & 1,50 & 0,12\% \tabularnewline
Young's modulus & minimize & 3 & 10,26 & 0,80\% \tabularnewline
Peel-off adhesion & maximize & 9 & 47,62 & 3,72\% \tabularnewline
Presence of characteristic feature &target & 1 & 1,50 & 0,12\% \tabularnewline
Substrate preparation time & minimize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Number of steps & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
time of application & minimize & 9 & 19,89 & 1,55\% \tabularnewline
Film preparation time & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Equipment Cost & minimize & 3 & 4,50 & 0,35\% \tabularnewline
Consumables cost per hour & minimize & 9 & 13,51 & 1,05\% \tabularnewline
Material cost per area & minimize & 9 & 13,89 & 1,08\% \tabularnewline
Wetting & minimize & 9 & 28,44 & 2,22\% \tabularnewline
Maximum Heat Absorption & minimize & 9 & 14,14 & 1,10\% \tabularnewline
Stain resistance & maximize & 9 & 34,28 & 2,67\% \tabularnewline
Surface texture &target & 9 & 85,20 & 6,65\% \tabularnewline
Area of residue left & minimize & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Self-healing properties &target & 9 & 22,27 & 1,74\% \tabularnewline
Ability of repair with DIY paint repair kits (decorative only) &target & 3 & 5,00 & 0,39\% \tabularnewline
Polishing quality & maximize & 3 & 5,00 & 0,39\% \tabularnewline
Scratch resistance & maximize & 9 & 34,15 & 2,66\% \tabularnewline
Edge Roughness & minimize & 9 & 38,78 & 3,03\% \tabularnewline
Presence of adhesive &target & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Cling adhesion &target & 3 & 7,51 & 0,59\% \tabularnewline
Opacity & maximize & 9 & 15,80 & 1,23\% \tabularnewline
Colour deviation & minimize & 9 & 76,19 & 5,94\% \tabularnewline
Thickness & minimize & 9 & 29,98 & 2,34\% \tabularnewline
Edge visibility & minimize & 9 & 22,77 & 1,78\% \tabularnewline
Gloss &target & 9 & 55,80 & 4,35\% \tabularnewline
Transmittance of protective film & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Presence of bubbles &target & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Features supporting bubble-free application &target & 3 & 6,01 & 0,47\% \tabularnewline
Orange peel look &target & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Variation in surface roughness & minimize & 9 & 11,63 & 0,91\% \tabularnewline
Rubbing wear resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Reactivity with chemical substances &target & 9 & 39,41 & 3,07\% \tabularnewline
Abrasion Resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Nano-scratch resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Elongation &target & 9 & 23,52 & 1,83\% \tabularnewline
Stone chipping resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Impact toughness & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Shear adhesion & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Edge adhesion & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Pressure adhesion & maximize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Surface Energy & maximize & 9 & 18,39 & 1,43\% \tabularnewline
Possibility to apply custom colour &target & 9 & 14,64 & 1,14\% \tabularnewline
Printability &target & 3 & 4,88 & 0,38\% \tabularnewline
Possible to store in production area &target & 9 & 12,39 & 0,97\% \tabularnewline
Colour changing properties &target & 9 & 9,76 & 0,76\% \tabularnewline
Thermal conductivity &target & 9 & 14,39 & 1,12\% \tabularnewline
Thermal expansion coefficient &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Minimum operating temperature &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Maximum operating temperature &target & 9 & 20,52 & 1,60\% \tabularnewline
Hardness & maximize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Change in toughness per time & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Gloss loss over time & minimize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Corrosion resistance & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Water absorption & maximize & 9 & 29,23 & 2,28\% \tabularnewline
Air tightness & maximize & 3 & 5,75 & 0,45\% \tabularnewline
Solubility in water &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Shrinkage & minimize & 9 & 17,26 & 1,35\% \tabularnewline
Yellowing & minimize & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Presence of toxic substances &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Toxicity after disposal &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Flammability &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Percentage content of recyclable materials & maximize & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Presence of standard Toxic substances &target & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Friction drag coefficient & minimize & 9 & 9,38 & 0,73\% \tabularnewline
Mass per area & minimize & 9 & 13,14 & 1,02\% \tabularnewline
Usage of special or specific tools &target & 3 & 3,50 & 0,27\% \tabularnewline \hline
\end{tabularx}
\end{document}
Bis vor kurzem habe ich hauptsächlich mit ShareLaTeX gearbeitet, mit dem ich das Dokument kompilieren und mir die Ergebnisse anzeigen konnte.
Ich wechsle jetzt jedoch zu TeXstudio und beim Versuch, die Tabelle dort zu kompilieren, zeigt das Protokoll die unten gezeigten Fehler an. Als ich zu ShareLaTeX zurückkehrte, stellte ich fest, dass es dieselben Fehler anzeigt, aber das Ergebnis anzeigen kann und das Ergebnis zufriedenstellend ist.
! LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing \item.
See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.101 \end{tabularx}
Try typing <return> to proceed.
If that doesn't work, type X <return> to quit.
! Misplaced \noalign.
\rowcolor ->\noalign
{\ifnum 0=`}\fi \global \let \CT@do@color \CT@@do@color...
l.101 \end{tabularx}
I expect to see \noalign only after the \cr of
an alignment. Proceed, and I'll ignore this case.
! LaTeX Error: There's no line here to end.
See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.101 \end{tabularx}
Your command was ignored.
Type I <command> <return> to replace it with another command,
or <return> to continue without it.
! LaTeX Error: There's no line here to end.
See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.101 \end{tabularx}
Your command was ignored.
Type I <command> <return> to replace it with another command,
or <return> to continue without it.
Diese Fehler treten mehrfach auf. Ich habe nur einen Teil des Protokolls kopiert, ohne dass sie sich wiederholen. Ich habe mindestens vier weitere Tabellen wie diese und in jeder von ihnen treten die gleichen Fehler auf.
Ich bin ein ziemlicher Neuling in Sachen TeX und verwende es nur für Universitätsdokumente. Es kann also sein, dass irgendwas ganz Offensichtliches damit nicht stimmt, aber ich kann nichts Besonderes erkennen.
Dank im Voraus!
Antwort1
Das Problem ist dasselbe, wie wenn Sie ein \captioninnerhalb einer nicht schwebenden Umgebung ( tabularx) haben, obwohl ltablexdefiniert ist tabularxals , longtablewas definiert \caption.
Nutzen Sie \captionof{table}{...}es von außen tabularx, um das Gewünschte zu erhalten.
MWE (ich habe die Spalten nicht angepasst, das überlasse ich Ihnen als Übung)
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper,twoside,table]{report}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{helvet}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[]{xcolor}
\definecolor{steelblue}{RGB}{70,130,180}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage[labelfont=bf,textfont=normal,justification=justified,singlelinecheck=false]{caption}
\usepackage{ltablex}
\begin{document}
\footnotesize
\renewcommand\arraystretch{1.25}
\captionof{table}{\small Sample caption.}\label{tab:qfd}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{
>{\setlength\hsize{0.5 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.15 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.17 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.08 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.1 \hsize}\centering}X}
\rowcolor{steelblue} \textcolor{white}{Quality Characteristics (Requirements)} & \textcolor{white}{Minimize, Maximize, or Target} & \textcolor{white}{Max Relationship} & \textcolor{white}{Requirement Weight} & \textcolor{white}{Relative Weight} \tabularnewline
Possibility of Automation & maximize & 9 & 14,64 & 1,14\% \tabularnewline
Curling & minimize & 1 & 1,50 & 0,12\% \tabularnewline
Young's modulus & minimize & 3 & 10,26 & 0,80\% \tabularnewline
Peel-off adhesion & maximize & 9 & 47,62 & 3,72\% \tabularnewline
Presence of characteristic feature &target & 1 & 1,50 & 0,12\% \tabularnewline
Substrate preparation time & minimize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Number of steps & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
time of application & minimize & 9 & 19,89 & 1,55\% \tabularnewline
Film preparation time & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Equipment Cost & minimize & 3 & 4,50 & 0,35\% \tabularnewline
Consumables cost per hour & minimize & 9 & 13,51 & 1,05\% \tabularnewline
Material cost per area & minimize & 9 & 13,89 & 1,08\% \tabularnewline
Wetting & minimize & 9 & 28,44 & 2,22\% \tabularnewline
Maximum Heat Absorption & minimize & 9 & 14,14 & 1,10\% \tabularnewline
Stain resistance & maximize & 9 & 34,28 & 2,67\% \tabularnewline
Surface texture &target & 9 & 85,20 & 6,65\% \tabularnewline
Area of residue left & minimize & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Self-healing properties &target & 9 & 22,27 & 1,74\% \tabularnewline
Ability of repair with DIY paint repair kits (decorative only) &target & 3 & 5,00 & 0,39\% \tabularnewline
Polishing quality & maximize & 3 & 5,00 & 0,39\% \tabularnewline
Scratch resistance & maximize & 9 & 34,15 & 2,66\% \tabularnewline
Edge Roughness & minimize & 9 & 38,78 & 3,03\% \tabularnewline
Presence of adhesive &target & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Cling adhesion &target & 3 & 7,51 & 0,59\% \tabularnewline
Opacity & maximize & 9 & 15,80 & 1,23\% \tabularnewline
Colour deviation & minimize & 9 & 76,19 & 5,94\% \tabularnewline
Thickness & minimize & 9 & 29,98 & 2,34\% \tabularnewline
Edge visibility & minimize & 9 & 22,77 & 1,78\% \tabularnewline
Gloss &target & 9 & 55,80 & 4,35\% \tabularnewline
Transmittance of protective film & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Presence of bubbles &target & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Features supporting bubble-free application &target & 3 & 6,01 & 0,47\% \tabularnewline
Orange peel look &target & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Variation in surface roughness & minimize & 9 & 11,63 & 0,91\% \tabularnewline
Rubbing wear resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Reactivity with chemical substances &target & 9 & 39,41 & 3,07\% \tabularnewline
Abrasion Resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Nano-scratch resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Elongation &target & 9 & 23,52 & 1,83\% \tabularnewline
Stone chipping resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Impact toughness & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Shear adhesion & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Edge adhesion & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Pressure adhesion & maximize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Surface Energy & maximize & 9 & 18,39 & 1,43\% \tabularnewline
Possibility to apply custom colour &target & 9 & 14,64 & 1,14\% \tabularnewline
Printability &target & 3 & 4,88 & 0,38\% \tabularnewline
Possible to store in production area &target & 9 & 12,39 & 0,97\% \tabularnewline
Colour changing properties &target & 9 & 9,76 & 0,76\% \tabularnewline
Thermal conductivity &target & 9 & 14,39 & 1,12\% \tabularnewline
Thermal expansion coefficient &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Minimum operating temperature &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Maximum operating temperature &target & 9 & 20,52 & 1,60\% \tabularnewline
Hardness & maximize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Change in toughness per time & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Gloss loss over time & minimize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Corrosion resistance & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Water absorption & maximize & 9 & 29,23 & 2,28\% \tabularnewline
Air tightness & maximize & 3 & 5,75 & 0,45\% \tabularnewline
Solubility in water &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Shrinkage & minimize & 9 & 17,26 & 1,35\% \tabularnewline
Yellowing & minimize & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Presence of toxic substances &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Toxicity after disposal &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Flammability &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Percentage content of recyclable materials & maximize & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Presence of standard Toxic substances &target & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Friction drag coefficient & minimize & 9 & 9,38 & 0,73\% \tabularnewline
Mass per area & minimize & 9 & 13,14 & 1,02\% \tabularnewline
Usage of special or specific tools &target & 3 & 3,50 & 0,27\% \tabularnewline \hline
\end{tabularx}
\end{document}
Antwort2
Der Hauptfehler liegt meiner Meinung nach in der Art und Weise, wie die relativen Längen für die XSpalten festgelegt werden. Die Summe der Koeffizienten muss in Ihrer Version nicht 1, sondern der Anzahl der Spalten, also 5, entsprechen.
Ich habe Ihre Tabelle mithilfe des SSpaltentyps von verbessert siunitx, um eine Ausrichtung am Dezimalpunkt zu erreichen, und den \theadBefehl von verwendet makecell, um eine einheitliche Formatierung der Spaltenüberschriften und der Zeilenumbrüche innerhalb dieser Überschriften zu erreichen.
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper,twoside,table, svgnames, x11names]{report}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{helvet}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{siunitx, makecell, booktabs}
\renewcommand\theadfont{\color{white}}%
\usepackage{xcolor}
\definecolor{steelblue}{RGB}{70,130,180}
\usepackage[labelfont=bf,textfont=normal,justification=justified,singlelinecheck=false]{caption}
\usepackage{ltablex}
\renewcommand{\tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\begin{document}
\footnotesize
\renewcommand\arraystretch{1.25}\setlength\tabcolsep{3pt}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{
>{\hsize=1.55\hsize}X
>{\hsize=0.45\hsize}X
cS[table-format=2.2, table-column-width =2cm]S[table-format=1.2]}
\caption{\small Sample caption.}
\label{tab:qfd} \\
\rowcolor{steelblue} \thead{Quality Characteristics \\(Requirements)} & \thead{Minimize, \\Maximize,\\ or Target} & {\thead{Max \\Relationship}} &{\thead{Requirement\\ Weight}} &{\thead{Relative\\ Weight (\%)}}\\\addlinespace
\endfirsthead
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\rowcolor{steelblue} \thead{Quality Characteristics \\(Requirements)} & \thead{Minimize, \\Maximize,\\ or Target} & {\thead{Max \\Relationship}} &{\thead{Requirement\\ Weight}} &{\thead{Relative\\ Weight (\%)}} \\\addlinespace
\endhead
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{5}{r}{\scriptsize to be continued}
\endfoot
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\bottomrule
\endlastfoot
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Possibility of Automation & maximize & 9 & 14,64 & 1,14 \\
Curling & minimize & 1 & 1,50 & 0,12 \\
Young's modulus & minimize & 3 & 10,26 & 0,80 \\
Peel-off adhesion & maximize & 9 & 47,62 & 3,72 \\
Presence of characteristic feature & target & 1 & 1,50 & 0,12 \\
Substrate preparation time & minimize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Number of steps & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40 \\
time of application & minimize & 9 & 19,89 & 1,55 \\
Film preparation time & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40 \\
Equipment Cost & minimize & 3 & 4,50 & 0,35 \\
Consumables cost per hour & minimize & 9 & 13,51 & 1,05 \\
Material cost per area & minimize & 9 & 13,89 & 1,08 \\
Wetting & minimize & 9 & 28,44 & 2,22 \\
Maximum Heat Absorption & minimize & 9 & 14,14 & 1,10 \\
Stain resistance & maximize & 9 & 34,28 & 2,67 \\
Surface texture & target & 9 & 85,20 & 6,65 \\
Area of residue left & minimize & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29 \\
Self-healing properties & target & 9 & 22,27 & 1,74 \\
Ability of repair with\break DIY paint repair kits\break (decorative only) & target & 3 & 5,00 & 0,39 \\
Polishing quality & maximize & 3 & 5,00 & 0,39 \\
Scratch resistance & maximize & 9 & 34,15 & 2,66 \\
Edge Roughness & minimize & 9 & 38,78 & 3,03 \\
Presence of adhesive & target & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29 \\
Cling adhesion & target & 3 & 7,51 & 0,59 \\
Opacity & maximize & 9 & 15,80 & 1,23 \\
Colour deviation & minimize & 9 & 76,19 & 5,94 \\
Thickness & minimize & 9 & 29,98 & 2,34 \\
Edge visibility & minimize & 9 & 22,77 & 1,78 \\
Gloss & target & 9 & 55,80 & 4,35 \\
Transmittance of\break protective film & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Presence of bubbles & target & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41 \\
Features supporting\break bubble-free application & target & 3 & 6,01 & 0,47 \\
Orange peel look & target & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41 \\
Variation in surface roughness & minimize & 9 & 11,63 & 0,91 \\
Rubbing wear resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32 \\
Reactivity with \break chemical substances & target & 9 & 39,41 & 3,07 \\
Abrasion Resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32 \\
Nano-scratch resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32 \\
Elongation & target & 9 & 23,52 & 1,83 \\
Stone chipping resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32 \\
Impact toughness & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32 \\
Shear adhesion & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Edge adhesion & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Pressure adhesion & maximize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40 \\
Surface Energy & maximize & 9 & 18,39 & 1,43 \\
Possibility to apply custom colour & target & 9 & 14,64 & 1,14 \\
Printability & target & 3 & 4,88 & 0,38 \\
Possible to store\break in production area & target & 9 & 12,39 & 0,97 \\
Colour changing properties & target & 9 & 9,76 & 0,76 \\
Thermal conductivity & target & 9 & 14,39 & 1,12 \\
Thermal expansion coefficient & target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Minimum operating temperature & target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Maximum operating temperature & target & 9 & 20,52 & 1,60 \\
Hardness & maximize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40 \\
Change in toughness per time & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40 \\
Gloss loss over time & minimize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Corrosion resistance & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Water absorption & maximize & 9 & 29,23 & 2,28 \\
Air tightness & maximize & 3 & 5,75 & 0,45 \\
Solubility in water & target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20 \\
Shrinkage & minimize & 9 & 17,26 & 1,35 \\
Yellowing & minimize & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41 \\
Presence of toxic substances & target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46 \\
Toxicity after disposal & target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46 \\
Flammability & target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46 \\
Percentage content of \break recyclable materials & maximize & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29 \\
Presence of standard \break Toxic substances & target & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32 \\
Friction drag coefficient & minimize & 9 & 9,38 & 0,73 \\
Mass per area & minimize & 9 & 13,14 & 1,02 \\
Usage of special \break or specific tools & target & 3 & 3,50 & 0,27
\end{tabularx}
\end{document}
Antwort3
Ich glaube, ich habe die Fehlerursache gefunden, bin mir aber nicht hundertprozentig sicher.
Betrachten Sie das MWE (gekürzte Version des problematischen Codes des OP):
\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage[labelfont=bf,textfont=normal,justification=justified,singlelinecheck=false]{caption}
\usepackage{ltablex}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{
>{\setlength\hsize{0.5 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.15 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.17 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.08 \hsize}\centering}X
>{\setlength\hsize{0.1 \hsize}\centering}X}
% \caption{\small Sample caption.\label{tab:qfd}} \tabularnewline
A & B & C & D & E \tabularnewline
\hline
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \tabularnewline
\end{tabularx}
\end{document}
1) Die Kompilierung funktioniert einwandfrei, wenn \captionauskommentiert ist, es tritt jedoch ein Fehler bezüglich eines auf, ...missing \itemwenn \captiondieses drin gelassen wird, ähnlich dem, was OP meldet.
2) Wenn wir \captiones auskommentiert lassen und eines der \tabularnewlineElemente in ändern \\, erhalten wir ebenfalls einen Fehler.
was mich zu der Annahme bringt, dass es etwas mit \\vs. zu tun haben könnte. Die typische Lösung hierfür besteht darin, aus dem Paket \tabularnewlineeinzubinden , das im Wesentlichen die Definition hat:\arraybackslasharray
\def\arraybackslash{\let\\\tabularnewline}
Wenn wir in einschließen \arraybackslash(und eine kleine Änderung mit vornehmen, \newcolumntypeum es kompakter zu machen):
\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage[labelfont=bf,textfont=normal,justification=justified,singlelinecheck=false]{caption}
\usepackage{ltablex}
\newcolumntype{Y}[1]{>{\setlength\hsize{#1\hsize}\centering\arraybackslash}X}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{Y{0.5}Y{0.15}Y{0.17}Y{0.08}Y{0.1}}
\caption{\small Sample caption.\label{tab:qfd}} \tabularnewline
A & B & C & D & E \tabularnewline
\hline
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \tabularnewline
\end{tabularx}
\end{document}
tabularxEs funktioniert jetzt fehlerfrei mit der in der Umgebung enthaltenen Beschriftung .
Nun, ich bin mir nicht sicherWarumdas ist so, also werde ich meine Antwort löschen, wenn eine ausführlichere Antwort kommt. Vorerst werde ich die schnelle Lösung für @Slovakov bereitstellen:
Spezifische Lösung:
\documentclass{report}
\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
\definecolor{steelblue}{RGB}{70,130,180}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage[labelfont=bf,textfont=normal,justification=justified,singlelinecheck=false]{caption}
\usepackage{ltablex}
\newcolumntype{Y}[1]{>{\setlength\hsize{#1\hsize}\centering\arraybackslash}X}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{Y{0.5}Y{0.15}Y{0.17}Y{0.08}Y{0.1}}
\caption{\small Sample caption.\label{tab:qfd}} \tabularnewline
\rowcolor{steelblue} \textcolor{white}{Quality Characteristics ( Requirements)} & \textcolor{white}{Minimize, Maximize, or Target} & \textcolor{white}{Max Relationship} & \textcolor{white}{Requirement Weight} & \textcolor{white}{Relative Weight} \tabularnewline
Possibility of Automation & maximize & 9 & 14,64 & 1,14\% \tabularnewline
Curling & minimize & 1 & 1,50 & 0,12\% \tabularnewline
Young's modulus & minimize & 3 & 10,26 & 0,80\% \tabularnewline
Peel-off adhesion & maximize & 9 & 47,62 & 3,72\% \tabularnewline
Presence of characteristic feature &target & 1 & 1,50 & 0,12\% \tabularnewline
Substrate preparation time & minimize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Number of steps & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
time of application & minimize & 9 & 19,89 & 1,55\% \tabularnewline
Film preparation time & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Equipment Cost & minimize & 3 & 4,50 & 0,35\% \tabularnewline
Consumables cost per hour & minimize & 9 & 13,51 & 1,05\% \tabularnewline
Material cost per area & minimize & 9 & 13,89 & 1,08\% \tabularnewline
Wetting & minimize & 9 & 28,44 & 2,22\% \tabularnewline
Maximum Heat Absorption & minimize & 9 & 14,14 & 1,10\% \tabularnewline
Stain resistance & maximize & 9 & 34,28 & 2,67\% \tabularnewline
Surface texture &target & 9 & 85,20 & 6,65\% \tabularnewline
Area of residue left & minimize & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Self-healing properties &target & 9 & 22,27 & 1,74\% \tabularnewline
Ability of repair with DIY paint repair kits (decorative only) &target & 3 & 5,00 & 0,39\% \tabularnewline
Polishing quality & maximize & 3 & 5,00 & 0,39\% \tabularnewline
Scratch resistance & maximize & 9 & 34,15 & 2,66\% \tabularnewline
Edge Roughness & minimize & 9 & 38,78 & 3,03\% \tabularnewline
Presence of adhesive &target & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Cling adhesion &target & 3 & 7,51 & 0,59\% \tabularnewline
Opacity & maximize & 9 & 15,80 & 1,23\% \tabularnewline
Colour deviation & minimize & 9 & 76,19 & 5,94\% \tabularnewline
Thickness & minimize & 9 & 29,98 & 2,34\% \tabularnewline
Edge visibility & minimize & 9 & 22,77 & 1,78\% \tabularnewline
Gloss &target & 9 & 55,80 & 4,35\% \tabularnewline
Transmittance of protective film & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Presence of bubbles &target & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Features supporting bubble-free application &target & 3 & 6,01 & 0,47\% \tabularnewline
Orange peel look &target & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Variation in surface roughness & minimize & 9 & 11,63 & 0,91\% \tabularnewline
Rubbing wear resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Reactivity with chemical substances &target & 9 & 39,41 & 3,07\% \tabularnewline
Abrasion Resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Nano-scratch resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Elongation &target & 9 & 23,52 & 1,83\% \tabularnewline
Stone chipping resistance & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Impact toughness & maximize & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Shear adhesion & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Edge adhesion & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Pressure adhesion & maximize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Surface Energy & maximize & 9 & 18,39 & 1,43\% \tabularnewline
Possibility to apply custom colour &target & 9 & 14,64 & 1,14\% \tabularnewline
Printability &target & 3 & 4,88 & 0,38\% \tabularnewline
Possible to store in production area &target & 9 & 12,39 & 0,97\% \tabularnewline
Colour changing properties &target & 9 & 9,76 & 0,76\% \tabularnewline
Thermal conductivity &target & 9 & 14,39 & 1,12\% \tabularnewline
Thermal expansion coefficient &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Minimum operating temperature &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Maximum operating temperature &target & 9 & 20,52 & 1,60\% \tabularnewline
Hardness & maximize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Change in toughness per time & minimize & 3 & 5,13 & 0,40\% \tabularnewline
Gloss loss over time & minimize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Corrosion resistance & maximize & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Water absorption & maximize & 9 & 29,23 & 2,28\% \tabularnewline
Air tightness & maximize & 3 & 5,75 & 0,45\% \tabularnewline
Solubility in water &target & 9 & 15,39 & 1,20\% \tabularnewline
Shrinkage & minimize & 9 & 17,26 & 1,35\% \tabularnewline
Yellowing & minimize & 9 & 18,02 & 1,41\% \tabularnewline
Presence of toxic substances &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Toxicity after disposal &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Flammability &target & 9 & 18,77 & 1,46\% \tabularnewline
Percentage content of recyclable materials & maximize & 9 & 16,51 & 1,29\% \tabularnewline
Presence of standard Toxic substances &target & 9 & 16,89 & 1,32\% \tabularnewline
Friction drag coefficient & minimize & 9 & 9,38 & 0,73\% \tabularnewline
Mass per area & minimize & 9 & 13,14 & 1,02\% \tabularnewline
Usage of special or specific tools &target & 3 & 3,50 & 0,27\% \tabularnewline \hline
\end{tabularx}
\end{document}
