Derzeit wird pdfLaTeX verwendet, der folgende Code:
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
Es scheint wahrscheinlich, dass Boleslaus wenn nicht der Anführer, so doch zumindest maßgeblich an der heidnischen Revolte beteiligt war, einer Meuterei des Adels in den 1030er Jahren, mit der das Christentum abgewendet werden sollte.
gibt mir dies:
Der Text ist insgesamt zweispaltig, was erklärt, warum manche über die Seite hinausgehenden Texte unsichtbar sind.
Wenn ich zwischen dem Ende des Epigramms und dem Anfang des Textes eine Leerzeile einfüge, etwa so:
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental in the Pagan Reaction, a mutiny of the nobility in the 1030s in an attempt to ward off Christianity.
Die Reaktion, die ich bekomme, ist
aber der zusätzliche Leerraum führt zu Waisen.
Dank im Voraus!
edit: ein minimaler Code-Fehler:
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper,twocolumn,twoside]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{epigraph}
\begin{document}
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence – indications of him in the earliest primary sources are limited to a mention of Boleslaus II (r. 1058-1076) with an extra ‘I’ in the Tyniec Sacramentary\footnote{A sacramentarium is a Catholic liturgical book akin to a Missal, but lacking all the parts not said by the priest.}, written about thirty years after the Forgotten’s death. The first time he is reliably mentioned is in the the Chronicle of Greater Poland, which gives some clue as to why the evidence is so scanty:
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental in the Pagan Reaction, a mutiny of the nobility in the 1030s in an attempt to ward off Christianity. In an effort to quell paganism in the country, it seems that his brother, successor (and one-time monk) Casimir I and his descendants came up with an efficient solution to hiding the skeletons in the closet of the House of Piast – damnatio memoriæ.
\end{document}
Antwort1
Das Problem liegt nicht am Ende \epigraph, sondern am Anfang!
Die fehlende Leerzeile davor \epigraphführt dazu, dass alles schief geht und es zu Fehlern auf sehr niedriger Ebene kommt, da das ignorierte \prevdepthElement fehl am Platz ist, wenn TeX sich nicht wie vorgesehen im vertikalen Modus befindet.
Die Befehlsdefinition sollte mit beginnen \par.
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper,twocolumn,twoside]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{epigraph}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\pretocmd{\epigraph}{\par}{}{}
\begin{document}
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental
\end{document}
Andererseits fände ich es klarer,verwendenLeerzeilen.
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental
Ich habe es gelassen, aber für doppelte Anführungszeichen "sollte das Zeichen niemals verwendet werden.