reducir el espacio en blanco debajo del árbol tikz-qtree

Question

Estoy incluyendo árboles sintácticos en mi disertación. Debajo de cada árbol hay una enorme cantidad de espacio en blanco, lo que hará que la oficina editorial de la universidad grite, aúlle y se queje, y finalmente rechace mi tesis hasta que la arregle. ¿Cómo elimino el espacio en blanco superfluo debajo del árbol?

MWE:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz-qtree,tikz-qtree-compat}
\usepackage{gb4e}
\tikzset{every tree node/.style={align=center, anchor=north}}
\begin{document}
The relevant structure in \ref{tree:opt-marker-verb-move} shows the necessary movement for the verb to precede the suffix. XP refers to some unknown structure to which the verb is drawn.

\begin{exe}
\ex
\leavevmode\vadjust{\vspace{-\baselineskip}}\newline %this command makes the example number line up with the top of the tree, rather than the bottom
\begin{tikzpicture}
\tikzset{every tree node/.style={align=center,anchor=north}}
\Tree [.XP \node(XP){}; 
[.\textsc{FocusP} =em 
[.TP
[.vP {} 
[.VP {} 
[.V \node(VERB){puv}; ] 
] ] ] ] ]
\draw[->] (VERB) [in=-90,out=-90,looseness=1.5] to (XP);
\end{tikzpicture}\label{tree:opt-marker-verb-move}
\end{exe}

It is difficult to justify this verbal movement. First, we would have to identify a higher structure in a suitable relationship with the verb to motivate verbal movement. Then we would have to identify features to check that exist on both the new structure and the verb.
\end{document}

Answer 1

Una opción es usar pgfinterruptboundingboxpara interrumpir el cuadro delimitador del camino curvo; Entonces será necesario agregar algo de espaciado manual (o, consulte a continuación para evitar la intervención manual):

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz-qtree,tikz-qtree-compat}
\usepackage{gb4e}
\tikzset{every tree node/.style={align=center, anchor=north}}
\begin{document}
The relevant structure in \ref{tree:opt-marker-verb-move} shows the necessary movement for the verb to precede the suffix. XP refers to some unknown structure to which the verb is drawn.


\begin{exe}
\ex
\leavevmode\vadjust{\vspace{-\baselineskip}}\newline %this command makes the example number line up with the top of the tree, rather than the bottom
\begin{tikzpicture}
\tikzset{every tree node/.style={align=center,anchor=north}}
\Tree [.XP \node(XP){}; 
[.\textsc{FocusP} =em 
[.TP
[.vP {} 
[.VP {} 
[.V \node(VERB){puv}; ] 
] ] ] ] ]
\begin{pgfinterruptboundingbox}
\draw[->] (VERB) [in=-90,out=-90,looseness=1.5] to (XP);
\end{pgfinterruptboundingbox}
\end{tikzpicture}\vspace{30pt}
\label{tree:opt-marker-verb-move}
\end{exe}

It is difficult to justify this verbal movement. First, we would have to identify a higher structure in a suitable relationship with the verb to motivate verbal movement. Then we would have to identify features to check that exist on both the new structure and the verb.

\end{document}

Para evitar tener que agregar espacios a mano, simplemente coloque cualquier elemento sensible (un nodo vacío, por ejemplo) debajo del más bajo después de que se haya interrumpido el cuadro delimitador:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz-qtree,tikz-qtree-compat}
\usetikzlibrary{positioning}
\usepackage{gb4e}
\tikzset{every tree node/.style={align=center, anchor=north}}
\begin{document}
The relevant structure in \ref{tree:opt-marker-verb-move} shows the necessary movement for the verb to precede the suffix. XP refers to some unknown structure to which the verb is drawn.


\begin{exe}
\ex
\leavevmode\vadjust{\vspace{-\baselineskip}}\newline %this command makes the example number line up with the top of the tree, rather than the bottom
\begin{tikzpicture}
\tikzset{every tree node/.style={align=center,anchor=north}}
\Tree [.XP \node(XP){}; 
[.\textsc{FocusP} =em 
[.TP
[.vP {} 
[.VP {} 
[.V \node(VERB){puv}; ] 
] ] ] ] ]
\begin{pgfinterruptboundingbox}
\draw[->] (VERB) [in=-90,out=-90,looseness=1.5] to (XP);
\end{pgfinterruptboundingbox}
\node[below=of VERB] {};
\end{tikzpicture}
\label{tree:opt-marker-verb-move}
\end{exe}

It is difficult to justify this verbal movement. First, we would have to identify a higher structure in a suitable relationship with the verb to motivate verbal movement. Then we would have to identify features to check that exist on both the new structure and the verb.

\end{document}

Answer 2

Podría usarlo \useasboundingboxantes del \drawcomando, para evitar que influya en el cuadro delimitador. Se debe agregar algo de espacio adicional debajo para la flecha, de ahí [yshift=-1.2cm](encontrado por prueba y error).

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz-qtree,tikz-qtree-compat}
\usepackage{gb4e}
\tikzset{every tree node/.style={align=center, anchor=north}}
\begin{document}
The relevant structure in \ref{tree:opt-marker-verb-move} shows the necessary movement for the verb to precede the suffix. XP refers to some unknown structure to which the verb is drawn.

\begin{exe}
\ex
\leavevmode\vadjust{\vspace{-\baselineskip}}\newline %this command makes the example number line up with the top of the tree, rather than the bottom
\begin{tikzpicture}
\tikzset{every tree node/.style={align=center,anchor=north}}
\Tree [.XP \node(XP){}; 
[.\textsc{FocusP} =em 
[.TP
[.vP {} 
[.VP {} 
[.V \node(VERB){puv}; ] 
] ] ] ] ]
\useasboundingbox (current bounding box.north west) rectangle ([yshift=-1.2cm]current bounding box.south east);

\draw[->] (VERB) [in=-90,out=-90,looseness=1.5] to (XP);
\end{tikzpicture}\label{tree:opt-marker-verb-move}
\end{exe}

It is difficult to justify this verbal movement. First, we would have to identify a higher structure in a suitable relationship with the verb to motivate verbal movement. Then we would have to identify features to check that exist on both the new structure and the verb.
\end{document}

Answer 3

Pude eliminar la mayor parte del espacio en blanco jugueteando con el valor de salida en el comando de dibujo. Lo cambié de -90 a -180 y logré el espacio deseado.