No tengo un MWE, ya que apareció al final de la página 12 de un documento en el que estoy trabajando (por sorpresa). Sólo me pregunto si alguien reconocerá lo que está pasando. Me parece que el espacio entre líneas cambia mucho, sin que yo haya solicitado que eso suceda:
Este comportamiento no fue solicitado y, si es posible, me gustaría asegurarme de que no ocurra. Imprimí \baselineskipy \baselinestretchparecen ser iguales en ambos párrafos.
Agradecería consejos de depuración relevantes. Tenga en cuenta que unos párrafos más tarde el espacio en el documento vuelve a la normalidad.
El código fuente para esta región (y un poco más) es:
conversation is actually foundational for meaning. It looks as though
Ogden and Richards have already been all over this point, and so I'll
cede the floor to
them.\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference}}
\paragraph{A fundamental dilemma}
Quote \ref{myq:71} puts forth the quote, which is not due to
\citet{serres1982parasite} (as it might appear) but which is actually
from \citet{clarke1999constructing} -- which I'm trying to track down.
\begin{quote}
With this recognition the phatic function becomes the constitutive
occasion for all communication, which can thus no longer be
conceptualized in the absence of difference and delay, resistance,
static, and noise.\footnote{Quoted it \cite{siegert2007cacography}.}
\end{quote}
Something very similar to this is what interested me in phatics in my
Respuesta1
Bien, siguiendo con el comentario de Barbara Beeton: es solo cuestión de introducir espacios en blanco entre el texto estándar y \begin{quote}y \end{quote}.
conversation is actually foundational for meaning. It looks as though
Ogden and Richards have already been all over this point, and so I'll
cede the floor to them.\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference}}
\paragraph{A fundamental dilemma}
Quote \ref{myq:71} puts forth the quote, which is not due to
\citet{serres1982parasite} (as it might appear) but which is actually
from \citet{clarke1999constructing} -- which I'm trying to track down.
\begin{quote}
With this recognition the phatic function becomes the constitutive
occasion for all communication, which can thus no longer be
conceptualized in the absence of difference and delay, resistance,
static, and noise.\footnote{Quoted it \cite{siegert2007cacography}.}
\end{quote}
Something very similar to this is what interested me in phatics in my