Disculpas, soy nuevo en Latex. Intentando crear una tabla pero viene condensada. Toda la mesa mide unos 3 cm de altura. Quiero que la tabla con diseño vertical de una hoja A4 sea decentemente legible. Por favor ayuda.
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{*{14}{|c}|}%{|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\textbf{S No.}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Test Description}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{High Level Steps}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Expected Output}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{PQA Status}} \\ \hline
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR & a)Take the available complete IHC portfolio.b)Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc)Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ \hline
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout & a)Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout & a)Choose an option with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
4 & Swap with IM and without IM & a)Take one year swap and run it with IM.b)Take the same swap and run it without IM. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases. & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
}
\end{table}
Gracias y saludos Varun.
Respuesta1
Rediseñaría tu mesa:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{booktabs, makecell, tabularx}
\renewcommand\theadfont{\bfseries}
\renewcommand\theadgape{}
\newcolumntype{L}{>{\RaggedRight}X}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\footnotesize
\setlength\tabcolsep{3pt}
\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{@{} l
>{\hsize=0.8\hsize}L
>{\hsize=1.2\hsize}L
*{2}{L}
@{}}
\toprule
\thead[b]{S\\ No.}
& \thead{Test Description}
& \thead{High Level Steps}
& \thead{Expected Output}
& \thead{PQA Status} \\
\midrule
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
& a) Take the available complete IHC portfolio.\quad
b) Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc). Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data
& 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\
\addlinespace
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& a) Choose a swap with one year maturity. \quad
b) Apply both methodologies on the swap. \quad
c) Plot the exposure profile on a graph.
& For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& a) Choose an option with one year maturity. \quad
b) Apply both methodologies on the swap. \quad
c) Plot the exposure profile on a graph
& For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
4 & Swap with IM and without IM
& a)Take one year swap and run it with IM. \quad
b) Take the same swap and run it without IM.
Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
& With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}%
\end{table}
\end{document}
editar:considerando la sugerencia dadaleandrorespuesta, pero con código mejorado, la tabla puede ser:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{booktabs, makecell, tabularx}
\renewcommand\theadfont{\bfseries}
\renewcommand\theadgape{}
\newcolumntype{L}{>{\RaggedRight}X}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\AtBeginEnvironment{table}{%
\setlist[enumerate]{nosep, % <-- list setup used in all tables
topsep = 0pt,
partopsep = 0pt,
wide,
label=\alph*),
before = \vspace{-0.6\baselineskip},
}
}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\footnotesize
\setlength\tabcolsep{3pt}
\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{@{} l
>{\hsize=0.8\hsize}L
>{\hsize=1.2\hsize}L
*{2}{L}
@{}}
\toprule
\thead[b]{S\\ No.}
& \thead{Test Description}
& \thead{High Level Steps}
& \thead{Expected Output}
& \thead{PQA Status} \\
\midrule
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
& \begin{enumerate}
\item Take the available complete IHC portfolio.
\item Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc).
\end{enumerate}
Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data
& 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\
\addlinespace
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& \begin{enumerate}
\item Choose a swap with one year maturity.
\item Apply both methodologies on the swap.
\item Plot the exposure profile on a graph.
\end{enumerate}
& For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& \begin{enumerate}
\item Choose an option with one year maturity.
\item Apply both methodologies on the swap.
\item Plot the exposure profile on a graph
\end{enumerate}
& For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
4 & Swap with IM and without IM
& \begin{enumerate}
\item Take one year swap and run it with IM.
\item Take the same swap and run it without IM.
\end{enumerate}
Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
& With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\end{document}
lo que da:
Respuesta2
Hice algunos pequeños cambios.
Eliminé las 14 columnas que tenías. Estás usando sólo 4.
Ajusté el ancho de la primera columna a
1cmFijé el tamaño de celda como
(\textwidth-1cm)/4.Eliminé
\resizeboxy cambié el tamaño de fuente manualmente con\footnotesize. Cambia esto a tu voluntad.Los eliminé
\multicolumnsporque en realidad no los estabas usando.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\footnotesize
% \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{|p{1cm}*{4}{|p{\dimexpr(\textwidth-1cm)/4\relax}}|}%{|l|l|l|l|l|}
\hline
\textbf{S No.} & \textbf{Test Description} & \textbf{High Level Steps} & \textbf{Expected Output} & \textbf{PQA Status} \\ \hline
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR & a)Take the available complete IHC portfolio.b)Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc)Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ \hline
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout & a)Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout & a)Choose an option with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
4 & Swap with IM and without IM & a)Take one year swap and run it with IM.b)Take the same swap and run it without IM. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases. & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
% }
\end{table}
\end{document}
Respuesta3
Un enfoque diferente hacia el uso tabularxy el enumeratemedio ambiente:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\raggedright\arraybackslash}X}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{cYYYY}
\textbf{S No.} & \textbf{Test Description} & \textbf{High Level Steps} & \textbf{Expected Output} & \textbf{PQA Status} \\ \midrule
1
& Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
& \begin{enumerate}[a)]\vspace*{-1.5\baselineskip}
\item Take the available complete IHC portfolio.
\item Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaR
\item Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data
\end{enumerate}
& 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ \midrule
\end{tabularx}%
\end{table}
\end{document}
Respuesta4
Aquí hay otra tabularxsolución basada en: utiliza el ltipo de columna para la primera columna y Xcolumnas modificadas para las cuatro columnas de datos. Elimina todas las reglas verticales y utiliza pocas reglas horizontales, pero bien espaciadas. Observe que los espacios en blanco pueden tener el mismo efecto que una regla sólida con el fin de crear un divisor visual. El material de cada celda está configurado irregularmente a la derecha en lugar de justificado completamente, al tiempo que permite la separación de palabras. Corbatas (~ Se insertan ), según sea necesario, para evitar saltos de línea incorrectos en las segundas columnas de datos. Finalmente, sugiero eliminar elnegritadesde la fila del encabezado ya que realmente no es necesario.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]{geometry} % set page parameters suitably
\usepackage{tabularx,booktabs,caption,ragged2e}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}X}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[ht!]
\setlength\tabcolsep{4pt} % default is 6pt
\captionsetup{skip=0.333\baselineskip}
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests} \label{BT2}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{@{} l *{4}{Y} @{}}
\toprule
S No. & Test Description & High-Level Steps & Expected Output & PQA Status\\
\midrule
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
& a) Take the available complete IHC portfolio. b)~Obtain the same COB production 10~Day VaR\@. c)~Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data
& 10~Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\
\addlinespace
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& a) Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)~Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)~Plot the exposure profile on a graph
& For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.
& The same result can be implied from already-run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& a) Choose an option with one year maturity. b)~Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)~Plot the exposure profile on a graph
& For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already-run test cases.\\
\addlinespace
4 & Swap with IM and without IM
& a) Take one year swap and run it with~IM\@. b)~Take the same swap and run it without~IM\@. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
& With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already-run test cases.\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\end{document}