Actualmente, usando pdfLaTeX, el siguiente código:
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
Parece probable que Boleslao fuera, si no el líder, al menos instrumental en la Reacción Pagana, un motín de la nobleza en la década de 1030 en un intento de protegerse del cristianismo.
me da esto:
En general, el texto está dividido en dos columnas, lo que explica por qué parte del texto que sale de la página es invisible.
Si inserto una línea en blanco entre el final del epigrama y el comienzo del texto así:
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental in the Pagan Reaction, a mutiny of the nobility in the 1030s in an attempt to ward off Christianity.
la reacción que tengo es
pero el espacio en blanco adicional provoca huérfanos.
¡Gracias de antemano!
editar: un error de código mínimo:
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper,twocolumn,twoside]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{epigraph}
\begin{document}
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence – indications of him in the earliest primary sources are limited to a mention of Boleslaus II (r. 1058-1076) with an extra ‘I’ in the Tyniec Sacramentary\footnote{A sacramentarium is a Catholic liturgical book akin to a Missal, but lacking all the parts not said by the priest.}, written about thirty years after the Forgotten’s death. The first time he is reliably mentioned is in the the Chronicle of Greater Poland, which gives some clue as to why the evidence is so scanty:
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental in the Pagan Reaction, a mutiny of the nobility in the 1030s in an attempt to ward off Christianity. In an effort to quell paganism in the country, it seems that his brother, successor (and one-time monk) Casimir I and his descendants came up with an efficient solution to hiding the skeletons in the closet of the House of Piast – damnatio memoriæ.
\end{document}
Respuesta1
¡El problema no está al final \epigraph, sino al principio!
La línea en blanco que falta antes \epigraphhace que todo salga mal, causando errores de muy bajo nivel debido al ignorado \prevdepthque está fuera de lugar si TeX no está en modo vertical como debería estar.
La definición del comando debe comenzar con \par.
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper,twocolumn,twoside]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{epigraph}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\pretocmd{\epigraph}{\par}{}{}
\begin{document}
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental
\end{document}
Por otro lado, me resultaría más clarousarlíneas en blanco.
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental
Lo dejé, pero para comillas dobles "nunca se debe usar el carácter.