인수가 있는 명령 및 명령 내부의 여러 결과(명령 내부...)

인수가 있는 명령 및 명령 내부의 여러 결과(명령 내부...)

동일한 유형의 작업(수신 표현식의 특정 구문 분석)을 수행하는 명령을 다른 명령 내에서 재사용하고 싶습니다. 이 명령은 문서의 내용을 구성해야 하며 문서 본문이나 세 번째 명령에서도 반복적으로 발생할 수 있습니다. .

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xparse}
\usepackage{tikz}

\ExplSyntaxOn
\int_new:N \l_opt_number_int
\cs_new_protected:Npn \parsecommand #1#2#3#4#5 {
%\NewDocumentCommand{\parsecommand}{
%   m   % #1 expression to parse
%   m   % #2 */empty
%   m   % #3 +/-/empty
%   m   % #4 part before ! / 1
%   m   % #5 part after ! / empty
%}{
\int_zero:N \l_opt_number_int
\tl_clear:N #2
\tl_clear:N #3
\tl_clear:N #4
\tl_clear:N #5
\tl_if_in:NnTF #1 {!} {
  \tl_map_inline:Nn #1 {
    \bool_set_false:N \l_done_bool
    \tl_case:Nn ##1 {
    * {\int_compare:nT {\l_opt_number_int < 1}{
        \tl_set_eq:NN #2 ##1
        \bool_set_true:N \l_done_bool
        \int_set:Nn \l_opt_number_int {1}}}
    - {\int_compare:nT {\l_opt_number_int < 2}{
        \tl_set_eq:NN #3 ##1
        \bool_set_true:N \l_done_bool
        \int_set:Nn \l_opt_number_int {2}}}
    + {\int_compare:nT {\l_opt_number_int < 2}{
        \tl_set_eq:NN #3 ##1
        \bool_set_true:N \l_done_bool
        \int_set:Nn \l_opt_number_int {2}}}
    ! {\int_compare:nT {\l_opt_number_int < 3}{
        \bool_set_true:N \l_done_bool
        \int_set:Nn \l_opt_number_int {3}}}
      }
    \bool_if:NF \l_done_bool {
      \int_compare:nTF {\l_opt_number_int < 3}
        {\tl_put_right:Nn #4 {##1}}
        {\tl_put_right:Nn #5 {##1}}
      }
    }
  }
  {\tl_set_eq:NN #5 #1}
  \tl_if_empty:NT #4 {\tl_put_right:Nn #4 {1}}
}
\ExplSyntaxOff

\NewDocumentCommand{\othercommandone}{m}{
    \parsecommand{#1}{\a}{\b}{\c}{\d}
    \{#1\} $\rightarrow$ \{\a\}\{\b\}\{\c\}\{\d\}
}

\NewDocumentCommand{\othercommandtwo}{m}{
\def\incoming{#1}
    \parsecommand{\incoming}{\a}{\b}{\c}{\d}
    \{\incoming\} $\rightarrow$ \{\a\}\{\b\}\{\c\}\{\d\}
}

\NewDocumentCommand{\drawcommandone}{m}{
  \begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
    \parsecommand{#1}{\douter}{\danchor}{\nthy}{\dlabel}
    \draw (-1,0) -- (1,0);
    \node at (0,\nthy*5mm) {\dlabel};
  \end{tikzpicture}
}

\NewDocumentCommand{\drawcommandtwo}{m}{
  \begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
    \def\incoming{#1}
    \parsecommand{\incoming}{\douter}{\danchor}{\nthy}{\dlabel}
    \draw (-1,0) -- (1,0);
    \node at (0,\nthy*1cm) {\dlabel};
  \end{tikzpicture}
}

\begin{document}

\def\something{*+5!abc}
\def\somethingelse{+777}
\def\somethingmore{-!$\sqrt{\alpha}$}

Directly in the document command works\ldots

\parsecommand{\something}{\a}{\b}{\c}{\d}
\{\something\} $\rightarrow$ \{\a\}\{\b\}\{\c\}\{\d\}

\parsecommand{\somethingelse}{\a}{\b}{\c}{\d}
\{\somethingelse\} $\rightarrow$ \{\a\}\{\b\}\{\c\}\{\d\}

\parsecommand{\somethingmore}{\a}{\b}{\c}{\d}
\{\somethingmore\} $\rightarrow$ \{\a\}\{\b\}\{\c\}\{\d\}
\bigskip

If command is used directly with argument, there are no problems\ldots

\othercommandone{\something}

\othercommandone{\somethingelse}

\othercommandone{\somethingmore}
\bigskip

If command is used via intermediate macro, there are problems\ldots

\othercommandtwo{\something}

\othercommandtwo{\somethingelse}

\othercommandtwo{\somethingmore}
\bigskip

For purity of experiment, application inside \verb|tikzpicture| directly with argument, everything is fine\ldots

\drawcommandone{\something}
\hspace{1cm}
\drawcommandone{\somethingelse}
\hspace{1cm}
\drawcommandone{\somethingmore}
\bigskip

Finally, as it must be, with internal intermediate transformation (it is planned to split comma-separated values), problems arise again\ldots

\drawcommandtwo{\something}
\hspace{1cm}
\drawcommandtwo{\somethingelse}
\hspace{1cm}
\drawcommandtwo{\somethingmore}

\end{document}

복잡한 상황에서 명령을 사용하면 구문 분석된 표현식의 일부 값이 누락되는 등 다양한 오류가 발생합니다. 이 명령은 내부 세 번째 명령 내부에서 사용됩니다 tikzpicture. 예를 들어 \pgfgettransformentries.

[2017/02/05] 예시가 보다 현실적인 상황으로 대체되었습니다. 이제는 내 뜻대로 되지 않네요.

스크린샷

[2017/04/05] 어쨌든 제가 이해하기 어려운 부분이 있습니다(어쩌면 피할 수 없는 일이겠죠)...

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xparse}
\usepackage{tikz}

\ExplSyntaxOn

\NewDocumentCommand{\extractfirst}{mm}{\tl_set:Nx #1 {\clist_item:Nn #2 {1} }}

\NewDocumentCommand{\extractlast}{mm}{\tl_set:Nx #1 {\clist_item:Nn #2 {-1} }}

\int_new:N \l_opt_number_int
\cs_new_protected:Npn \parsecommand #1#2#3#4#5 {
%\NewDocumentCommand{\parsecommand}{
%   m   % #1 expression to parse
%   m   % #2 */empty
%   m   % #3 +/-/empty
%   m   % #4 part before ! / 1
%   m   % #5 part after ! / empty
%}{
\int_zero:N \l_opt_number_int
\tl_clear:N #2
\tl_clear:N #3
\tl_clear:N #4
\tl_clear:N #5
\tl_if_in:NnTF #1 {!} {
  \tl_map_inline:Nn #1 {
    \bool_set_false:N \l_done_bool
    \tl_case:Nn ##1 {
    * {\int_compare:nT {\l_opt_number_int < 1}{
        \tl_set_eq:NN #2 ##1
        \bool_set_true:N \l_done_bool
        \int_set:Nn \l_opt_number_int {1}}}
    - {\int_compare:nT {\l_opt_number_int < 2}{
        \tl_set_eq:NN #3 ##1
        \bool_set_true:N \l_done_bool
        \int_set:Nn \l_opt_number_int {2}}}
    + {\int_compare:nT {\l_opt_number_int < 2}{
        \tl_set_eq:NN #3 ##1
        \bool_set_true:N \l_done_bool
        \int_set:Nn \l_opt_number_int {2}}}
    ! {\int_compare:nT {\l_opt_number_int < 3}{
        \bool_set_true:N \l_done_bool
        \int_set:Nn \l_opt_number_int {3}}}
      }
    \bool_if:NF \l_done_bool {
      \int_compare:nTF {\l_opt_number_int < 3}
        {\tl_put_right:Nn #4 {##1}}
        {\tl_put_right:Nn #5 {##1}}
      }
    }
  }
  {\tl_set_eq:NN #5 #1}
  \tl_if_empty:NT #4 {\tl_put_right:Nn #4 {1}}
}
\ExplSyntaxOff

\NewDocumentCommand{\drawcommandone}{m}{%
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
\extractfirst{\frstprt}{#1}
\extractlast{\lstprt}{#1}

\draw (-3,0) -- (-1,0);
\node [anchor=north] at (-2,0) {\frstprt};
\parsecommand{\frstprt}{\douter}{\danchor}{\nthy}{\dlabel}
\node at (-2,\nthy*4mm) {\dlabel};

\draw (1,0) -- (3,0);
\node [anchor=north] at (2,0) {\lstprt};
\parsecommand{\lstprt}{\douter}{\danchor}{\nthy}{\dlabel}
\node at (2,\nthy*4mm) {\dlabel};
\end{tikzpicture}%
}

\NewDocumentCommand{\drawcommandtwo}{m}{%
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
\def\incoming{#1}%
\extractfirst{\frstprt}{\incoming}
\extractlast{\lstprt}{\incoming}

\draw (-3,0) -- (-1,0);
\node [anchor=north] at (-2,0) {\frstprt};
\expandafter\parsecommand\expandafter{\frstprt}{\douter}{\danchor}{\nthy}{\dlabel}
\node at (-2,\nthy*4mm) {\dlabel};

\draw (1,0) -- (3,0);
\node [anchor=north] at (2,0) {\lstprt};
\expandafter\parsecommand\expandafter{\lstprt}{\douter}{\danchor}{\nthy}{\dlabel}
\node at (2,\nthy*4mm) {\dlabel};
\end{tikzpicture}%
}

\begin{document}

%\def\something{*+5!first,+2!second}
%\def\something{+777,*!150}
\def\something{3!$\sqrt{\alpha}$,2!$\beta^2$}

\drawcommandone{\something}
\vspace{1cm}

\drawcommandtwo{\something}

\end{document}

이 경우 결과를 일치시키는 방법은 무엇입니까?

스크린샷

답변1

내 의견에서 말했듯이, \parsecommand이에 대한 조치를 취하기 전에 주장을 확장해야 합니다.

\NewDocumentCommand{\drawcommandtwo}{m}{%
  \begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
    \def\incoming{#1}%
    \expandafter\parsecommand\expandafter{\incoming}{\douter}{\danchor}{\nthy}{\dlabel}
    \draw (-1,0) -- (1,0);
    \node at (0,\nthy*5mm) {\dlabel};
  \end{tikzpicture}%
}

여기에 이미지 설명을 입력하세요

관련 정보