죄송합니다. 저는 라텍스를 처음 사용합니다. 테이블을 생성하려고 하는데 압축된 상태로 표시됩니다. 전체 테이블의 높이는 약 3Cm입니다. A4 시트의 세로 레이아웃에 있는 테이블을 읽기 좋게 만들고 싶습니다. 도와주세요.
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{*{14}{|c}|}%{|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\textbf{S No.}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Test Description}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{High Level Steps}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Expected Output}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{PQA Status}} \\ \hline
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR & a)Take the available complete IHC portfolio.b)Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc)Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ \hline
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout & a)Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout & a)Choose an option with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
4 & Swap with IM and without IM & a)Take one year swap and run it with IM.b)Take the same swap and run it without IM. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases. & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
}
\end{table}
감사와 감사의 바룬
답변1
나는 당신의 테이블을 다시 디자인할 것입니다 :
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{booktabs, makecell, tabularx}
\renewcommand\theadfont{\bfseries}
\renewcommand\theadgape{}
\newcolumntype{L}{>{\RaggedRight}X}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\footnotesize
\setlength\tabcolsep{3pt}
\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{@{} l
>{\hsize=0.8\hsize}L
>{\hsize=1.2\hsize}L
*{2}{L}
@{}}
\toprule
\thead[b]{S\\ No.}
& \thead{Test Description}
& \thead{High Level Steps}
& \thead{Expected Output}
& \thead{PQA Status} \\
\midrule
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
& a) Take the available complete IHC portfolio.\quad
b) Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc). Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data
& 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\
\addlinespace
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& a) Choose a swap with one year maturity. \quad
b) Apply both methodologies on the swap. \quad
c) Plot the exposure profile on a graph.
& For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& a) Choose an option with one year maturity. \quad
b) Apply both methodologies on the swap. \quad
c) Plot the exposure profile on a graph
& For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
4 & Swap with IM and without IM
& a)Take one year swap and run it with IM. \quad
b) Take the same swap and run it without IM.
Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
& With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}%
\end{table}
\end{document}
편집하다:주어진 제안을 고려린드리스하지만 개선된 코드를 사용하면 테이블은 다음과 같을 수 있습니다.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{booktabs, makecell, tabularx}
\renewcommand\theadfont{\bfseries}
\renewcommand\theadgape{}
\newcolumntype{L}{>{\RaggedRight}X}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\AtBeginEnvironment{table}{%
\setlist[enumerate]{nosep, % <-- list setup used in all tables
topsep = 0pt,
partopsep = 0pt,
wide,
label=\alph*),
before = \vspace{-0.6\baselineskip},
}
}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\footnotesize
\setlength\tabcolsep{3pt}
\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{@{} l
>{\hsize=0.8\hsize}L
>{\hsize=1.2\hsize}L
*{2}{L}
@{}}
\toprule
\thead[b]{S\\ No.}
& \thead{Test Description}
& \thead{High Level Steps}
& \thead{Expected Output}
& \thead{PQA Status} \\
\midrule
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
& \begin{enumerate}
\item Take the available complete IHC portfolio.
\item Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc).
\end{enumerate}
Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data
& 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\
\addlinespace
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& \begin{enumerate}
\item Choose a swap with one year maturity.
\item Apply both methodologies on the swap.
\item Plot the exposure profile on a graph.
\end{enumerate}
& For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& \begin{enumerate}
\item Choose an option with one year maturity.
\item Apply both methodologies on the swap.
\item Plot the exposure profile on a graph
\end{enumerate}
& For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
4 & Swap with IM and without IM
& \begin{enumerate}
\item Take one year swap and run it with IM.
\item Take the same swap and run it without IM.
\end{enumerate}
Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
& With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\end{document}
이는 다음을 제공합니다:
답변2
몇 가지 작은 변화를 주었습니다.
나는 당신이 가지고 있던 14개의 열을 제거했습니다. 4개만 사용하고 계십니다.
첫 번째 열의 너비를 다음과 같이 수정했습니다.
1cm셀 크기를
(\textwidth-1cm)/4.를 제거하고 를
\resizebox사용하여 글꼴 크기를 수동으로 변경했습니다\footnotesize. 이것을 마음대로 바꾸세요.\multicolumns실제로 사용하지 않았기 때문에 제거했습니다 .
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\footnotesize
% \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{|p{1cm}*{4}{|p{\dimexpr(\textwidth-1cm)/4\relax}}|}%{|l|l|l|l|l|}
\hline
\textbf{S No.} & \textbf{Test Description} & \textbf{High Level Steps} & \textbf{Expected Output} & \textbf{PQA Status} \\ \hline
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR & a)Take the available complete IHC portfolio.b)Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaRc)Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data & 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout & This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ \hline
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout & a)Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph & For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout & a)Choose an option with one year maturity. b)Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)Plot the exposure profile on a graph & For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
4 & Swap with IM and without IM & a)Take one year swap and run it with IM.b)Take the same swap and run it without IM. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases. & With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry. & The same result can be implied from already run test cases. \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
% }
\end{table}
\end{document}
답변3
tabularx사용 및 환경에 대한 다른 접근 방식 enumerate:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\raggedright\arraybackslash}X}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests}
\label{BT2}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{cYYYY}
\textbf{S No.} & \textbf{Test Description} & \textbf{High Level Steps} & \textbf{Expected Output} & \textbf{PQA Status} \\ \midrule
1
& Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
& \begin{enumerate}[a)]\vspace*{-1.5\baselineskip}
\item Take the available complete IHC portfolio.
\item Obtain the same COB production 10 Day VaR
\item Ensure trade population and notional match betweenTCM data and VaR data
\end{enumerate}
& 10 Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\ \midrule
\end{tabularx}%
\end{table}
\end{document}
답변4
또 다른 기반 솔루션은 다음과 같습니다 . 첫 번째 열에는 열 유형을 tabularx사용 하고 4개의 데이터 열에는 수정된 열을 사용합니다. 모든 수직 규칙을 없애고 소수이지만 간격이 넉넉한 수평 규칙을 사용합니다. 공백은 시각적 구분선을 만들기 위한 확실한 규칙으로서 모든 면에서 효과가 있을 수 있다는 점을 관찰하세요. 각 셀의 자료는 완전히 정렬되지 않고 오른쪽 정렬로 설정되며 하이픈을 허용합니다. 넥타이 (lX~ 두 번째 데이터 열에서 잘못된 줄 바꿈을 방지하기 위해 필요에 따라 )이 삽입됩니다. 마지막으로, 제거하는 것이 좋습니다.굵은 글씨실제로는 필요하지 않기 때문에 헤더 행에서 삭제합니다.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]{geometry} % set page parameters suitably
\usepackage{tabularx,booktabs,caption,ragged2e}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}X}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[ht!]
\setlength\tabcolsep{4pt} % default is 6pt
\captionsetup{skip=0.333\baselineskip}
\caption{MRMC Requested Benchmarking Tests} \label{BT2}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{@{} l *{4}{Y} @{}}
\toprule
S No. & Test Description & High-Level Steps & Expected Output & PQA Status\\
\midrule
1 & Comparison of complete IHC portfolio aggregated TCM with 10-Day VaR
& a) Take the available complete IHC portfolio. b)~Obtain the same COB production 10~Day VaR\@. c)~Ensure trade population and notional match between TCM data and VaR data
& 10~Day VaR should be lower and account for the gap risk in CVA Closeout
& This test was deemed unfit as variance between VaR and CVA Closeout can be because of various reasons like difference in choice of risk factors, etc. \\
\addlinespace
2 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& a) Choose a swap with one year maturity. b)~Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)~Plot the exposure profile on a graph
& For Swap the profile should be forward declining slope and in case of CVA closeout there should be a spike post the 1 year mark.
& The same result can be implied from already-run test cases. \\
\addlinespace
3 & Same trade Stressed CVA vs CVA Closeout
& a) Choose an option with one year maturity. b)~Apply both methodologies on the swap. c)~Plot the exposure profile on a graph
& For option it should be a straight line for both Stressed CVA and CVA Closeout. Just that for CVA closeout there should be a spike post expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already-run test cases.\\
\addlinespace
4 & Swap with IM and without IM
& a) Take one year swap and run it with~IM\@. b)~Take the same swap and run it without~IM\@. Note: Please use CVA closeout model in both cases.
& With IM graph should start higher, converging into without IM towards expiry.
& The same result can be implied from already-run test cases.\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\end{document}