현재 pdfLaTeX를 사용하여 다음 코드를 사용합니다.
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
볼레슬라우스는 지도자는 아니더라도 적어도 1030년대에 기독교를 막기 위해 귀족들이 반란을 일으킨 이교도 반동에 중요한 역할을 한 것으로 보입니다.
나에게 이것을 제공합니다 :
텍스트는 전체적으로 두 개의 열로 구성되어 있는데, 이는 페이지에서 벗어나는 일부 텍스트가 보이지 않는 이유를 설명합니다.
다음과 같이 에피그램의 끝과 텍스트의 시작 사이에 빈 줄을 삽입하면:
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental in the Pagan Reaction, a mutiny of the nobility in the 1030s in an attempt to ward off Christianity.
내가 받는 반응은
하지만 여분의 공백으로 인해 고아가 발생합니다.
미리 감사드립니다!
편집: 최소한의 코드 오류:
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper,twocolumn,twoside]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{epigraph}
\begin{document}
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence – indications of him in the earliest primary sources are limited to a mention of Boleslaus II (r. 1058-1076) with an extra ‘I’ in the Tyniec Sacramentary\footnote{A sacramentarium is a Catholic liturgical book akin to a Missal, but lacking all the parts not said by the priest.}, written about thirty years after the Forgotten’s death. The first time he is reliably mentioned is in the the Chronicle of Greater Poland, which gives some clue as to why the evidence is so scanty:
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity and the horrors of his crimes, … though he was awarded the crown royal, shall not be placed among the Polish kings and princes.}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental in the Pagan Reaction, a mutiny of the nobility in the 1030s in an attempt to ward off Christianity. In an effort to quell paganism in the country, it seems that his brother, successor (and one-time monk) Casimir I and his descendants came up with an efficient solution to hiding the skeletons in the closet of the House of Piast – damnatio memoriæ.
\end{document}
답변1
문제는 끝이 아닌 \epigraph시작 부분에 있습니다!
빈 줄이 없으면 \epigraph모든 것이 잘못되고 \prevdepthTeX가 수직 모드가 아닌 경우 무시되는 무시로 인해 매우 낮은 수준의 오류가 발생합니다.
명령 정의는 로 시작해야 합니다 \par.
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper,twocolumn,twoside]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{epigraph}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\pretocmd{\epigraph}{\par}{}{}
\begin{document}
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental
\end{document}
반면에 나는 더 명확하다고 생각합니다.사용빈 줄.
No sources from the time explicitly indicate his existence
\epigraph{"[Boleslaus] meanwhile, because of his severity}{Wielkopolska Chronicle}
It seems likely that Boleslaus was, if not the leader, at least instrumental
그대로 두었는데 큰따옴표에는 문자를 "절대 사용하면 안 됩니다.