![Espaço extra devido ao \patchcmd](https://rvso.com/image/281608/Espa%C3%A7o%20extra%20devido%20ao%20%5Cpatchcmd.png)
Parece que \patchcmd
from etoolbox
adiciona três espaços indesejados, conforme mostrado abaixo:
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\begin{document}
\tracingall% 3 spaces in log file
\def\test{1}]\patchcmd\test{1}{2}{}{}[% 3 spaces between brackets in output
\end{document}
Como posso consertar isso?
Responder1
Dois espaços vêm de chamadas de \scantokens
, o terceiro de um fim de linha desprotegido no código.
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\makeatletter
% Add \ifhmode\unskip\fi
\protected\def\etb@ifscanable#1{%
\begingroup
\edef\etb@resrvda{%
\def\noexpand\etb@resrvda####1\detokenize{macro}:####2->####3&{%
####1\def\string\etb@resrvda####2{####3}}%
\edef\noexpand\etb@resrvda{\noexpand\etb@resrvda\meaning#1&}}%
\etb@resrvda
\makeatletter
\scantokens\expandafter{\etb@resrvda}%
%%% ADDITION
\ifhmode\unskip\fi
%%% END ADDITION
\expandafter\endgroup\ifx#1\etb@resrvda
\expandafter\@firstoftwo
\else
\expandafter\@secondoftwo
\fi}
\def\etb@patchcmd@scantoks#1{%
\edef\etb@resrvda{\endgroup
\unexpanded{\makeatletter\scantokens}{#1}%
\catcode\number`\@=\the\catcode`\@\relax}%
\etb@resrvda
%%% ADDITION
\ifhmode\unskip\fi
%%% END ADDITION
}
% Fix a missing `%'
\protected\long\def\etb@ifpattern#1#2{%
\begingroup
\edef\etb@resrvda{%
\def\noexpand\etb@resrvda####1\detokenize{#2}####2&{%
\endgroup\noexpand\noexpand\noexpand\ifblank{####2}}%
\edef\noexpand\etb@resrvda{\noexpand\etb@resrvda
\expandafter\strip@prefix\meaning#1\detokenize{#2}&}%
\noexpand\etb@resrvda}% <---------- MISSING IN etoolbox.sty
\etb@resrvda\@secondoftwo\@firstoftwo}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\def\test{1}]\patchcmd\test{1}{2}{}{}[% brackets for checking
][% for check
\end{document}
Porém, a melhor estratégia é nunca usar \patchcmd
o modo horizontal.
O comando correspondente \xpatchcmd
de regexpatch
está livre deste problema.
Um patch diferente poderia ser adicionado \@empty
no final dos dois `\scantokens:
\protected\def\etb@ifscanable#1{%
\begingroup
\edef\etb@resrvda{%
\def\noexpand\etb@resrvda####1\detokenize{macro}:####2->####3&{%
####1\def\string\etb@resrvda####2{####3}}%
\edef\noexpand\etb@resrvda{\noexpand\etb@resrvda\meaning#1&}}%
\etb@resrvda
\makeatletter
\scantokens\expandafter{\etb@resrvda\@empty}% <---- ADDED
\expandafter\endgroup\ifx#1\etb@resrvda
\expandafter\@firstoftwo
\else
\expandafter\@secondoftwo
\fi}
\def\etb@patchcmd@scantoks#1{%
\edef\etb@resrvda{\endgroup
\unexpanded{\makeatletter\scantokens}{#1\noexpand\@empty}% <---- ADDED
\catcode\number`\@=\the\catcode`\@\relax}%
\etb@resrvda}
No segundo caso, \noexpand\@empty
é necessário, pois estamos dentro de um arquivo \edef
. No entanto, isso requer mais testes do que estou inclinado a fazer.
Eu teria gostado de corrigir os dois comandos \patchcmd
, mas eles resistem.