
Não tenho um MWE, pois apareceu no final da página 12 de um documento em que estou trabalhando (de surpresa). Só estou me perguntando se alguém reconhecerá o que está acontecendo. Parece-me que o espaçamento entre linhas muda muito, sem nenhum pedido meu para que isso aconteça:
Este comportamento não foi solicitado e, se possível, gostaria de ter certeza de que não ocorrerá. Eu imprimi \baselineskip
e \baselinestretch
eles parecem iguais em ambos os parágrafos.
Eu receberia dicas de depuração relevantes. Observe que alguns parágrafos depois o espaçamento no documento volta ao normal.
O código fonte desta região (e um pouco mais) é:
conversation is actually foundational for meaning. It looks as though
Ogden and Richards have already been all over this point, and so I'll
cede the floor to
them.\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference}}
\paragraph{A fundamental dilemma}
Quote \ref{myq:71} puts forth the quote, which is not due to
\citet{serres1982parasite} (as it might appear) but which is actually
from \citet{clarke1999constructing} -- which I'm trying to track down.
\begin{quote}
With this recognition the phatic function becomes the constitutive
occasion for all communication, which can thus no longer be
conceptualized in the absence of difference and delay, resistance,
static, and noise.\footnote{Quoted it \cite{siegert2007cacography}.}
\end{quote}
Something very similar to this is what interested me in phatics in my
Responder1
OK, acompanhando o comentário de Barbara Beeton - é apenas uma questão de introduzir um espaço em branco entre o texto padrão e o \begin{quote}
e \end{quote}
.
conversation is actually foundational for meaning. It looks as though
Ogden and Richards have already been all over this point, and so I'll
cede the floor to them.\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference}}
\paragraph{A fundamental dilemma}
Quote \ref{myq:71} puts forth the quote, which is not due to
\citet{serres1982parasite} (as it might appear) but which is actually
from \citet{clarke1999constructing} -- which I'm trying to track down.
\begin{quote}
With this recognition the phatic function becomes the constitutive
occasion for all communication, which can thus no longer be
conceptualized in the absence of difference and delay, resistance,
static, and noise.\footnote{Quoted it \cite{siegert2007cacography}.}
\end{quote}
Something very similar to this is what interested me in phatics in my