Я хочу добавить альтернативный текст (Alt-text), чтобы при наведении курсора на рисунки появлялось диалоговое окно. Кроме того, мне нужно убедиться, что в этом PDF реализована маркировка доступности PDF. Мой MWE ниже
\DocumentMetadata{}
\documentclass{book}
\twocolumn
\usepackage{amssymb,amsfonts}%
\usepackage{graphicx}%
\usepackage{tagpdf}
\usepackage{hyperxmp}
\usepackage{hyperref}%
\usepackage{booktabs}
\begin{document}
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.\begin{figure*}[!t]
\tagstructbegin{tag=Figure}\tagstructbegin{tag=Figure,alttext={Alt text content figure one}}\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{example-image}\tagmcend\tagstructend
\caption{Figure one with caption.}
\end{figure*}
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\tagstructbegin{tag=Figure}\tagstructbegin{tag=Figure,alttext={Alt text content figure two}}\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{example-image}\tagmcend\tagstructend
\caption{Figure with caption two.}
\end{figure*}
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\tagstructbegin{tag=Figure}\tagstructbegin{tag=Figure,alttext={Alt text content figure three}}\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{example-image}\tagmcend\tagstructend
\caption{Figure with caption three.}
\end{figure*}
\begin{table*}[!t]
\begin{tabular*}{\linewidth}{@{}lll@{}}
First10 & First20 & First30\\
First11 & First21 & First31\\
First12 & First22 & First32\\
First13 & First23 & First33\\
First14 & First24 & First34\\
First15 & First25 & First35\\
\end{tabular*}
\end{table*}
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists, including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy policies.
\end{document}
Ожидаемый результат, как показано ниже:
решение1
Тегирование не может быть выполнено путем добавления нескольких структурных команд только в нескольких местах. Вы должны тегировать весь документ. Необходимые модули должны быть загружены в \DocumentMetadata.
Что-то вроде этого будет работать (в лучшем случае компилировать с помощью lualatex). Обратите внимание, что всплывающее окно alt-текста появляется только если вы вставляете файл png или jpg, если вы включаете pdf, оно не отображается (по крайней мере, в моем просмотрщике pdf):
\DocumentMetadata{testphase={phase-III,table}} %add more modules as needed
\documentclass{book}
\twocolumn
\usepackage{amssymb,amsfonts}%
\usepackage{graphicx}%
\usepackage{hyperref}%
\usepackage{booktabs}
\begin{document}
The presence of non-Arctic and non-European countries in the Arctic has been
growing over the past two decades. Given the geographic distance of these
countries from the polar region, their presence in the High North may seem
surprising. In this article, we study the presence in Svalbard of scientists
from different origins and how they interact through an analysis of the field
missions in which they are involved. Combining network analysis and
interviews, we highlight the role of the stations located in the archipelago
for access to the field and the cooperation strategies of scientists,
including those from countries that do not have stations above the Arctic
Circle. We tackle issues of integration in this area by empirically
discussing three logics: (1) scientific autonomy, (2) core-periphery
structure, and (3) regional patterns of cooperation, thus going beyond an
approach strictly limited to the analysis of science diplomacy
policies.
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[scale=0.5,alt=Alt text content figure one]{example-image.png}
\caption{Figure one with caption.}
\end{figure*}
\begin{table*}[!t]
\begin{tabular*}{\linewidth}{@{}lll@{}}
First10 & First20 & First30\\
First11 & First21 & First31\\
First12 & First22 & First32\\
First13 & First23 & First33\\
First14 & First24 & First34\\
First15 & First25 & First35\\
\end{tabular*}
\end{table*}
\end{document}
