我的 SSH 代理轉發不起作用。答案從這個問題已經很老了，答案與評論相矛盾。我們可以有更新的答案嗎？
基本上我可以從電腦A 到電腦B，或從電腦A 到電腦C，但不能從電腦A 到電腦B，然後從電腦B 到電腦C。總是用於ssh -A強制 SSH 代理轉發。但我仍然無法在不要求輸入密碼的情況下連接電腦 A -> 電腦 B -> 電腦 C。
echo "$SSH_AUTH_SOCK"在伺服器和我的本機電腦上都可以工作，但是在從 A -> B 的 SSH 上，ssh-add -l會產生：
該代理人沒有身分。
而它在 A 上列出了兩個鍵。
三台機器都配置了標準的Ubuntu SSH配置，沒有任何改變，內容/etc/ssh/ssh_config發佈/etc/ssh/sshd_config在http://paste.ubuntu.com/11482964/。
編輯：按要求，
-Avvv這是從B到C的日誌：
OpenSSH_6.2p2 Ubuntu-6ubuntu0.1, OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013
debug1: Reading configuration data /home/myid/.ssh/config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 19: Applying options for *
debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
debug1: Connecting to boxc.
debug1: Connection established.
debug3: Incorrect RSA1 identifier
debug3: Could not load "/home/myid/.ssh/id_rsa" as a RSA1 public key
debug1: identity file /home/myid/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: Checking blacklist file /usr/share/ssh/blacklist.RSA-1024
debug1: Checking blacklist file /etc/ssh/blacklist.RSA-1024
debug1: identity file /home/myid/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug3: Incorrect RSA1 identifier
debug3: Could not load "/home/myid/.ssh/id_dsa" as a RSA1 public key
debug1: identity file /home/myid/.ssh/id_dsa type 2
debug1: Checking blacklist file /usr/share/ssh/blacklist.DSA-1024
debug1: Checking blacklist file /etc/ssh/blacklist.DSA-1024
debug1: identity file /home/myid/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/myid/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/myid/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.2p2 Ubuntu-6ubuntu0.1
debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_6.2p2 Ubuntu-6
debug1: match: OpenSSH_6.2p2 Ubuntu-6 pat OpenSSH*
debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug3: put_host_port: boxc
debug3: load_hostkeys: loading entries for host "boxc" from file "/home/myid/.ssh/known_hosts"
debug3: load_hostkeys: found key type RSA in file /home/myid/.ssh/known_hosts:15
debug3: load_hostkeys: loaded 1 keys
debug3: order_hostkeyalgs: prefer hostkeyalgs: [email protected],[email protected],ssh-rsa
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],[email protected],ssh-rsa,[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521,ssh-dss
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,[email protected],[email protected],aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,[email protected]
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,[email protected],[email protected],aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,[email protected]
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],[email protected],hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected],hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],[email protected],hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected],hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],zlib,none
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],zlib,none
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,[email protected],[email protected],aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,[email protected]
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,[email protected],[email protected],aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,[email protected]
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],[email protected],hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected],hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],[email protected],hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected],hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,[email protected]
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,[email protected]
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0
debug2: mac_setup: found [email protected]
debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr [email protected] [email protected]
debug2: mac_setup: found [email protected]
debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr [email protected] [email protected]
debug1: sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY
debug1: Server host key: RSA ed:26:20:93:4c:88:ef:17:70:e3:d4:7a:42:4c:8e:69
debug3: put_host_port: [192.168.2.122]:21
debug3: put_host_port: boxc
debug3: load_hostkeys: loading entries for host "boxc" from file "/home/myid/.ssh/known_hosts"
debug3: load_hostkeys: found key type RSA in file /home/myid/.ssh/known_hosts:15
debug3: load_hostkeys: loaded 1 keys
debug3: load_hostkeys: loading entries from file "/home/myid/.ssh/known_hosts"
debug3: load_hostkeys: found key type RSA in file /home/myid/.ssh/known_hosts:16
debug3: load_hostkeys: loaded 1 keys
debug1: Host 'boxc' is known and matches the RSA host key.
debug1: Found key in /home/myid/.ssh/known_hosts:15
debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct
debug2: kex_derive_keys
debug2: set_newkeys: mode 1
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
debug2: set_newkeys: mode 0
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: Roaming not allowed by server
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
debug2: service_accept: ssh-userauth
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
debug2: key: /home/myid/.ssh/id_rsa (0x7f7e....e760),
debug2: key: /home/myid/.ssh/id_dsa (0x7f7e....e7a0),
debug2: key: /home/myid/.ssh/id_ecdsa ((nil)),
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug3: start over, passed a different list publickey
debug3: preferred gssapi-keyex,gssapi-with-mic,publickey,keyboard-interactive,password
debug3: authmethod_lookup publickey
debug3: remaining preferred: keyboard-interactive,password
debug3: authmethod_is_enabled publickey
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Offering RSA public key: /home/myid/.ssh/id_rsa
debug3: send_pubkey_test
debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply
debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 149
debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp 22:32:...:1d:e3
debug3: sign_and_send_pubkey: RSA 22:32:...:1d:e3
debug1: key_parse_private_pem: PEM_read_PrivateKey failed
debug1: read PEM private key done: type <unknown>
Enter passphrase for key '/home/myid/.ssh/id_rsa':
答案1
一個合理的解釋如下：當您ssh從 A 到 B 時，源自 B 的 shell 啟動腳本會啟動 B 本地的代理。
如果 Bash 是 B 上的 shell，檢查你的.bashrcB。
假設腳本正確啟動代理B 本地$SSH_AUTH_SOCK。無所知當您ssh從 B 到 C 時，B 上的代理程式沒有身份，系統會要求您提供/home/myid/.ssh/id_rsaB 上儲存的金鑰的密碼。
如果您知道 B 上的先前值，$SSH_AUTH_SOCK則可以找到 B 上仍連接到 A 上執行的代理程式的套接字。$SSH_AUTH_SOCK我的觀點是轉發本身並沒有被破壞，B 上的 SSH 伺服器提供的套接字在那裡並且可以工作。問題是 B 上的進程無法找到它，因為它們找到並使用了錯誤的套接字，因為 B 上的代理已啟動並$SSH_AUTH_SOCK已更改。
您可以透過不允許 B 上的啟動腳本執行新代理來解決此問題。負責任的程式碼的存在可能是有原因的，所以刪除它不一定是一個好主意。問問自己原因是什麼。如果有理由保留程式碼，那麼一個明智的解決方案是讓腳本檢查是否$SSH_AUTH_SOCK擴展為空字串，然後再設定一個新代理程式。
我無法確定是否會發生這種情況在你的具體情況下;我仍然認為這種情況是合理的。