☰

我的數學論文的靈活枚舉

tag-icon • tag-icon numbering theorems
我的數學論文的靈活枚舉

所以我目前正在寫我的數學論文。

假設我在論文的「第5 節」中，並且正在按5.1、5.2、5.3 等排序引理、命題、定理和推論。新的5.2，舊的 5.2 將更改為 5.3，5.3 將更改為 5.4，...等等？

謝謝你的幫助

答案1

希望你已經發現這個問題在 LaTeX 中很容易解決（實際上，它本質上就是這樣）設計的for)，但這裡有一個明確構造供您查看。

嘗試編譯此文檔，無論其中是否包含引理。 （根據您編寫文件的方式，您可能必須連續運行 LaTeX 兩次才能在每次刪除引理時進行交叉引用解析。許多現代編輯器會自動執行此操作。）

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsthm,amssymb}    
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
% Theorem numbering is Sec#.Thm#
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
% Lemmata are numbered as theorems

\begin{document}
\section{A section with some politically motivated math in it}

The following Lemma is folklore among Business Administration circles of
the \emph{Paradigmatic Shift} school:

\begin{lemma}[Synergy Lemma]
    \label{lemma:synergy}
    Under the right circumstances, $1 + 1 = 3$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof} By adoption of a positive workplace culture. \end{proof}
\noindent
The Synergy Lemma proves quite useful to show the following celbrated result:

\begin{theorem}
    \label{thm:2+2=5}
    When it suits us, $2 + 2 = 5$. 
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof} Exercise for the reader; use good stomping boots. \end{proof}
\noindent
Theorem~\ref{thm:2+2=5} is commonly known as \emph{Orwell's Theorem},
though it is often (and more accurately) called \emph{Vissarionovich's Theorem}
in many eastern European countries.

\end{document}

相關內容