data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c285c/c285c4b5b365836feea24ef2c75896d95b0b70d5" alt="用大參數排版小函數"
我有一個需要大參數的小函數。現在我認為函數部分看起來太小並且隱含地表明它可能是某種乘法而不是求值。
\newcommand{\rect}{\mathrm{\textbf{rect}}}
...
\(\left[(\rect_\ell) \ast (f\ast g)\right]\left( x+\frac{2i-1}{2k},y+\frac{2j-1}{2k}\right)\)
它看起來像這樣,我認為它很醜:
答案1
使用\bigl
and\bigr
代替\left
and \right
,即確保外括號和圓括號大小相同,是否滿足您的需求?
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[euler-digits]{eulervm} % educated guess about fonts
\usepackage{palatino}
\newcommand{\rect}{\textbf{rect}} % don't use \mathbf as that would load Computer Modern
\begin{document}
before:
\(\left[(\rect_\ell) \ast (f\ast g)\right]
\left( x+\frac{2i-1}{2k},y+\frac{2j-1}{2k}\right)\)
\medskip
after:
\(\bigl[(\rect_\ell) \ast (f\ast g)\bigr]
\bigl( x+\frac{2i-1}{2k},y+\frac{2j-1}{2k}\bigr)\)
\end{document}
答案2
這是我的建議;我比較喜歡最後一個,沒有外括號。
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathpazo}
\usepackage[euler-digits]{eulervm}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand{\rect}{\textbf{rect}} % simplify definition of \rect
\begin{document}
Displayed
\begin{gather}
\bigl[(\rect_{l}) \ast (f\ast g)\bigr]
\bigl(x+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2i-1),y+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2j-1)\bigr)
\\
\bigl(\rect_{l} \ast (f\ast g)\bigr)
\bigl(x+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2i-1),y+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2j-1)\bigr)
\\
\rect_{l} \ast (f\ast g)
\bigl(x+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2i-1),y+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2j-1)\bigr)
\end{gather}
Text:\\[1ex]
$\bigl[(\rect_{l}) \ast (f\ast g)\bigr]
\bigl(x+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2i-1),y+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2j-1)\bigr)$\\[1ex]
$\bigl(\rect_{l} \ast (f\ast g)\bigr)
\bigl(x+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2i-1),y+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2j-1)\bigr)$\\[1ex]
$\rect_{l} \ast (f\ast g)
\bigl(x+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2i-1),y+\tfrac{1}{2k}(2j-1)\bigr)$
\end{document}