☰

調整行之間的距離並在每頁中重複標題？

tag-icon • tag-icon tables longtable
調整行之間的距離並在每頁中重複標題？

我在 中遇到了問題longtable，因為每列都很長，如圖所示，它會列印在一頁中，而且當轉到下一頁時，需要重複第一行標題。

在此輸入影像描述

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{caption}
\newcounter{temp}
\newcommand{\first}{\setcounter{temp}{1}\thetemp- }
\newcommand{\following}{\stepcounter{temp}\par\thetemp- }

\begin{document}
%\begin{landscape}
    \begin{center}
        \captionof{table}{Comparison Between the Wormhole Attacks}
        \begin{longtable}{|p{1.8cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.5cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.4cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.1cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.2cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.2cm}|} 
            \hline
            \textbf{Wormhole types} & \textbf{Encapsulation} & \textbf{Out of Band} & \textbf{High Power} & \textbf{Packet Relay} & \textbf{Protocol Deviations} \\\hline      
            Advantages  
            & \first there is a smaller probability of RREQ being discarded than other RREQs which are repeatedly received by intermediate nodes.
                \following RREQ packet arriving to destination, does not keep middle nodes as hops, and then it appears to have passed through minimum number of hops. 
            & \first Control packet arrives faster due to no process from middle nodes
                \following Less probability of discarding compare to RREQs which are repeatedly received by middle nodes.
                \following Control packets arrive at destination, middle nodes not use as hops, pass through less number of hops 
            & \first Control packets arrive faster
                \following Less probability of discarding compare to RREQs which are repeatedly received by middle nodes.
                \following Control packets arrive at destination, middle nodes not use as hops, pass through less number of hops    
            & \first Two nodes think they are neighbors although they are not, and every RREQ to be sent to neighbors will arrive to relay nodes invisibility.
                \following Control packet seems to arrive using minimum number of hops   
            & control packet arrives faster \\\hline  
            Advantages  
            & \first there is a smaller probability of RREQ being discarded than other RREQs which are repeatedly received by intermediate nodes.
            \following RREQ packet arriving to destination, does not keep middle nodes as hops, and then it appears to have passed through minimum number of hops. 
            & \first Control packet arrives faster due to no process from middle nodes
            \following Less probability of discarding compare to RREQs which are repeatedly received by middle nodes.
            \following Control packets arrive at destination, middle nodes not use as hops, pass through less number of hops 
            & \first Control packets arrive faster
            \following Less probability of discarding compare to RREQs which are repeatedly received by middle nodes.
            \following Control packets arrive at destination, middle nodes not use as hops, pass through less number of hops    
            & \first Two nodes think they are neighbors although they are not, and every RREQ to be sent to neighbors will arrive to relay nodes invisibility.
            \following Control packet seems to arrive using minimum number of hops   
            & control packet arrives faster \\\hline   

        \end{longtable}
    \end{center}
%\end{landscape}
\end{document}

答案1

對於重複標題，請使用\endfirsthead和\endhead。要增加行之間的間隙，您可以在組內使用makecell和。您不需要環境，因為預設情況下居中。順便說一句，你的桌子不適合寬度（我沒有糾正它）。\setcellgaps\makegapedcellscenterlongtale

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{caption}
\newcounter{temp}
\newcommand{\first}{\setcounter{temp}{1}\thetemp- }
\newcommand{\following}{\stepcounter{temp}\par\thetemp- }
\usepackage{makecell}
\setcellgapes{5pt}


\begin{document}
%\begin{landscape}
%    \begin{center}  longtable is centered by default
        %\captionof{table}{Comparison Between the Wormhole Attacks}
{\makegapedcells        \begin{longtable}{|p{1.8cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.5cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.4cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.1cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.2cm}|>{\RaggedRight}p{2.2cm}|}
           \caption{Comparison Between the Wormhole Attacks}\\ \hline
            \textbf{Wormhole types} & \textbf{Encapsulation} & \textbf{Out of Band} & \textbf{High Power} & \textbf{Packet Relay} & \textbf{Protocol Deviations} \\\hline
\endfirsthead
\hline
\textbf{Wormhole types} & \textbf{Encapsulation} & \textbf{Out of Band} & \textbf{High Power} & \textbf{Packet Relay} & \textbf{Protocol Deviations} \\\hline
\endhead
            Advantages
            & \first there is a smaller probability of RREQ being discarded than other RREQs which are repeatedly received by intermediate nodes.
                \following RREQ packet arriving to destination, does not keep middle nodes as hops, and then it appears to have passed through minimum number of hops.
            & \first Control packet arrives faster due to no process from middle nodes
                \following Less probability of discarding compare to RREQs which are repeatedly received by middle nodes.
                \following Control packets arrive at destination, middle nodes not use as hops, pass through less number of hops
            & \first Control packets arrive faster
                \following Less probability of discarding compare to RREQs which are repeatedly received by middle nodes.
                \following Control packets arrive at destination, middle nodes not use as hops, pass through less number of hops
            & \first Two nodes think they are neighbors although they are not, and every RREQ to be sent to neighbors will arrive to relay nodes invisibility.
                \following Control packet seems to arrive using minimum number of hops
            & control packet arrives faster \\\hline
            Advantages
            & \first there is a smaller probability of RREQ being discarded than other RREQs which are repeatedly received by intermediate nodes.
            \following RREQ packet arriving to destination, does not keep middle nodes as hops, and then it appears to have passed through minimum number of hops.
            & \first Control packet arrives faster due to no process from middle nodes
            \following Less probability of discarding compare to RREQs which are repeatedly received by middle nodes.
            \following Control packets arrive at destination, middle nodes not use as hops, pass through less number of hops
            & \first Control packets arrive faster
            \following Less probability of discarding compare to RREQs which are repeatedly received by middle nodes.
            \following Control packets arrive at destination, middle nodes not use as hops, pass through less number of hops
            & \first Two nodes think they are neighbors although they are not, and every RREQ to be sent to neighbors will arrive to relay nodes invisibility.
            \following Control packet seems to arrive using minimum number of hops
            & control packet arrives faster \\\hline

        \end{longtable}
}
%    \end{center}
%\end{landscape}
\end{document}

相關內容