我沒有 MWE，因為它出現在我正在處理的文檔第 12 頁的底部（令人驚訝）。我只是想知道是否有人會意識到發生了什麼事。在我看來，行間距似乎發生了很大變化，而我沒有任何要求應該發生這種情況：
沒有要求這種行為，如果可能的話，我想確保它不會發生。我會列印出來\baselineskip，\baselinestretch它們在兩個段落中似乎是相同的。
我歡迎相關的調試技巧。請注意，幾段後文件中的間距恢復正常。
該區域（以及更多）的源代碼是：
conversation is actually foundational for meaning. It looks as though
Ogden and Richards have already been all over this point, and so I'll
cede the floor to
them.\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference}}
\paragraph{A fundamental dilemma}
Quote \ref{myq:71} puts forth the quote, which is not due to
\citet{serres1982parasite} (as it might appear) but which is actually
from \citet{clarke1999constructing} -- which I'm trying to track down.
\begin{quote}
With this recognition the phatic function becomes the constitutive
occasion for all communication, which can thus no longer be
conceptualized in the absence of difference and delay, resistance,
static, and noise.\footnote{Quoted it \cite{siegert2007cacography}.}
\end{quote}
Something very similar to this is what interested me in phatics in my
答案1
好的，請跟進 Barbara Beeton 的評論 - 這只是在標準文字和 之間引入空格的\begin{quote}問題\end{quote}。
conversation is actually foundational for meaning. It looks as though
Ogden and Richards have already been all over this point, and so I'll
cede the floor to them.\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference}}
\paragraph{A fundamental dilemma}
Quote \ref{myq:71} puts forth the quote, which is not due to
\citet{serres1982parasite} (as it might appear) but which is actually
from \citet{clarke1999constructing} -- which I'm trying to track down.
\begin{quote}
With this recognition the phatic function becomes the constitutive
occasion for all communication, which can thus no longer be
conceptualized in the absence of difference and delay, resistance,
static, and noise.\footnote{Quoted it \cite{siegert2007cacography}.}
\end{quote}
Something very similar to this is what interested me in phatics in my