我做了一個複數命令

我做了一個複數命令

因此,我編寫了一個命令作為家庭作業,以正確呈現複數。就像,當我寫的時候\complfull{5}{-2}輸出是 5-2i

\documentclass{scrartcl}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{xstring}    %this package is needed for the if else commands like \IfStrEq

\newcommand{\complfull}[2]{     %This bracket covers the case for when the real part is zero
    \IfStrEq{#1}{0}{\IfStrEqCase{#2}{
        {0}         {0}                 %"If b is also zero, output zero"
        {1}         {i}     %"If b is just one, output 'i'(instead of '1i')"
        {-1}        {-i}}
    [#2\textit{i}]}{\IfStrEqCase{#2}{   %This bracket is the first command's "else" statement, so it covers the case when the real part is not zero
        {0}         {#1}                %"If the imaginary part is zero, output the real part"
        {1}         {#1+i}
        {-1}        {#1-i}}
    [\IfBeginWith{#2}{-}                %This covers the case when the imaginary part is negative and the real part is not zero. It is necessary because we can't have a number be displayed as "1+-4i", and doing it with brackets would necessitate every imaginary part to be written with brackets.
        {#1#2i}
        {#1+#2i}]}
}

\begin{document}
    
    \complfull{2}{-2}
    \complfull{0}{1}

\end{document}

此程式碼為我提供了一條輸入錯誤訊息,例如$\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{-3}$ 這些是錯誤訊息:

Undefined control sequence. $\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{-3}

TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [input stack size=10000]. $\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{-3}

然而,當我做類似的事情時,$\displaystyle\complfull{\frac{1}{2}}{-1}$效果就很好。

是什麼導致了這個問題?

答案1

切換到不同的測試方法並清理程式碼(我認為沒有理由\textit{i}在這裡使用,因為i在數學模式下已經是斜體了。

我確信這可以做得更簡單。版本現在不再使用任何東西,xstring因為他們的測試相當脆弱。

使用\NewDocumentCommand{\complfull}{m >{\TrimSpaces} m}{確保#2永遠不會以空格開頭,因為這會破壞虛部是否以 開頭的測試-

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{etoolbox}

% this assumes the arg never starts with spaces
\def\ProcessFirstChar#1#2\END{%
  \def\FirstChar{#1}
}
\def\DASHCHAR{-}

% input a,b, need to generate z = a+bi in a nice way
\NewDocumentCommand{\complfull}{m >{\TrimSpaces} m}{
  % if a =0
  \ifstrequal{#1}{0}{
      \ifstrequal{#2}{0}{
          0
        }{
          \ifstrequal{#2}{1}{
              i
            }{
              \ifstrequal{#2}{-1}{
                  -i
                }{ 
                  #2i% default
                }
            }
        }
    }{
      % a is not zero
      #1% just leave a
      \ifstrequal{#2}{0}{%
          % Im(z) = 0, so nothing
        }{
          \ifstrequal{#2}{1}{
              + i
            }{
              \ifstrequal{#2}{-1}{
                  -i
                }{
                  % still need the case when b is negative, as we should not add a plus in this case
                  \expandafter\ProcessFirstChar#2\END
                  \ifx\FirstChar\DASHCHAR\else+\fi
                  #2i
                }
              }
            }
          }
        }

\begin{document}


$\complfull{0}{0}$

$\complfull{0}{1}$

$\complfull{0}{-1}$

$\complfull{0}{5}$

$\complfull{1}{0}$

$\complfull{1}{1}$

$\complfull{1}{-1}$

$\complfull{1}{5}$

$\complfull{1}{-5}$

$\complfull{0}{3}$

$\complfull{a}{ - b}$

$\complfull{0}{3}$

$\complfull{\frac{-1}{12}}{-3}$

$\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{-\dfrac12}$

$\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{\dfrac12}$

\end{document}

答案2

(我重寫了答案,以更通用地解決OP的格式問題。)

這是一個基於 LuaLaTeX 的答案。它不做任何假設內容複數的實部和虛部,除了虛部可以以符號開頭之外-。 (相反,+不允許使用前導符號;但是,如果需要,可以削弱此限制。)

\complfull巨集可用於文字和數學模式。\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{-3}不會造成任何問題-只要載入amsmath提供巨集的套件即可。\dfrac

在此輸入影像描述

% !TEX TS-program = lualatex
\documentclass{scrartcl}
\usepackage{amsmath} % for '\ensuremath' macro
\usepackage{luacode} % for 'luacode' env. and '\luastringN' macro

\begin{luacode}
function complfull ( re , im ) -- inputs: real and imag. parts

  -- begin by stripping off any leading whitespace from 'im'
  im = im:gsub ( '^%s*' , '' ) 
  im = im:gsub ( '^%-%s*' , '-' )

  if im == '0' then -- real number
    return re 
  else 
    if re == '0' then -- imaginary number
      if im == '1' then 
        return 'i'
      elseif im == '-1' then 
        return '-i'
      else 
        return im..'i'
      end
    else -- complex number
      if im == '1' then 
        return re..'+i'
      elseif im == '-1' then 
        return re..'-i'
      else
        if im:sub(1,1)=='-' then 
          return re..im..'i'
        else 
          return re..'+'..im..'i'
        end
      end
    end
  end
end
\end{luacode}

\newcommand\complfull[2]{\ensuremath{\directlua{%
  tex.sprint(complfull(\luastringN{#1},\luastringN{#2}))}}}

\begin{document}
\complfull{1}{0}; 
\complfull{0}{1}, 
\complfull{0}{-1};  
\complfull{1}{1}, 
\complfull{1}{-1}; 
\complfull{\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{1}{2}},
\complfull{\frac{1}{2}}{-\frac{1}{2}};
\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{\exp(7)},
\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{-3}.
\end{document}

答案3

您的問題的答案:$\complfull{\dfrac{-1}{12}}{-3}$產生錯誤,因為您的\complull巨集應用於\IfStrEq其參數並\IfStrEq在處理過程中擴展它們\edef。且該\dfrac巨集未定義為\protected\def.它使用一種古老而晦澀的\protectLaTeX 方法,該方法不適用於\edef.

您正在解決的問題很有趣。我展示了我們可以用 OpTeX 做什麼:

\def\complfull#1#2{%
   \isequal{#1}{0}\iftrue \printimpart\empty{#2}%
                  \else {#1}\printimpart+{#2}%
                  \fi
}
\def\printimpart#1#2{%
   \qcasesof {#2}
   {}      {\ifx#1\empty 0\fi}
   {0}     {\ifx#1\empty 0\fi}
   {1}     {#1\imu}
   {-1}    {-\imu}
   \_finc  {\isminus #2\iftrue \else #1\fi {#2}\imu}%
}
\def\imu{{\rm i}}
\def\isminus #1#2\iftrue{\ifx-#1}

Test:
$\complfull{1}{0}; 
\complfull{0}{};
\complfull{0}{1}; 
\complfull{0}{-1};  
\complfull{1}{1}, 
\complfull{1}{-1}; 
\complfull{1\over2}{1\over2},
\complfull{1\over2}{-{1\over2}};
\complfull{-1\over12}{\exp(7)},$

\bye

該巨集是完全可擴展的,並且在處理巨集時\complfull不會擴展其參數。\isequal\qcasesof

相關內容