
I got it to work with
\mathop{\underline{\lim}}_{n \to \infty} f_n(x)
Above looks exactly how I want it to look, but initiating operators twice is odd and it's far from simple
\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x)
Or is it alright?
Responder1
If you are using the amsmath
package, you don't have to define a new operator; the package offers \varliminf
with the correct spacing:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\[ \varliminf_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) \]
\end{document}
Responder2
If this is used often, then declare it as a math operator. It promotes consistency (see Consistent typography) and ease-of-use:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}% http://ctan.org/pkg/amsmath
\DeclareMathOperator*{\inflim}{\underline{\lim}}
\begin{document}
\[ \mathop{\underline{\lim}}_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) \]
\[ \inflim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) \]
\end{document}
See the amsmath
documentation (section 5.1 Dening new operator names, p 17) for the use of/difference in DeclareMathOperator
and its starred variant.